Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28874928›Full record

ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2017

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Utilization in an Emergency Department Observation Unit.

Yadiel Sánchez, Brian J Yun, Anand M Prabhakar, McKinley Glover, Benjamin A White, Theodore I Benzer, Ali S Raja

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Emergency radiology: roadmap for radiology departments.Japanese journal of radiology · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Acute aortic syndromes and aortic emergencies.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yadiel SánchezHarvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiology, Boston, Massachusetts.
Brian J YunHarvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Anand M PrabhakarHarvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiology, Boston, Massachusetts.
McKinley GloverHarvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiology, Boston, Massachusetts.
Benjamin A WhiteHarvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Theodore I BenzerHarvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ali S RajaHarvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEmergency department observation units (EDOUs) are a valuable alternative to inpatient admissions for ED patients needing extended care. However, while the use of advanced imaging is becoming more common in the ED, there are no studies characterizing the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations in the EDOU.

methodsThis institutional review board-approved, retrospective study was performed at a 999-bed quaternary care academic Level I adult and pediatric trauma center, with approximately 114,000 ED visits annually and a 32-bed adult EDOU. We retrospectively reviewed the EDOU patient database for all MRI examinations done from October 1, 2013, to September 30, 2015. We sought to describe the most frequent uses for MRI during EDOU admissions and reviewed EDOU length of stay (LOS) to determine whether the use of MRI was associated with any change in LOS.

resultsA total of 22,840 EDOU admissions were recorded during the two-year study period, and 4,437 (19%) of these patients had a least one MRI examination during their stay; 2,730 (62%) of these studies were of the brain, head, or neck, and an additional 1,392 (31%) were of the spine. There was no significant difference between the median LOS of admissions in which an MRI study was performed (17.5 hours) and the median LOS (17.7 hours) of admissions in which an MRI study was not performed [p=0.33].

conclusionNeuroimaging makes up the clear majority of MRI examinations from our EDOU, and the use of MRI does not appear to prolong EDOU LOS. Future work should focus on the appropriateness of these MRI examinations to determine potential resource and cost savings.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualEmergency Service, HospitalHospitalizationHospital UnitsHumansLength of StayMagnetic Resonance ImagingMassachusettsNeuroimagingObservationRetrospective StudiesTrauma Centers

Identifiers

PMID28874928
PMCPMC5576612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.