Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28874335›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical education2017

Mobile Apps for Teaching Intubation: Scoping Review and Critical Analysis in eLearning.

Clyde Matava, Anne-Marie Leo, Fahad Alam

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical education, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Clyde Matava *Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9502-0981
Anne-Marie Leo *Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6576-5299
Fahad Alam *Department of Anesthesia, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9300-5713
University of Toronto · CAHospital for Sick Children · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAirway management is a core skill in anesthesia ensuring adequate oxygenation and delivery of inhalational agents for the patient.

objectiveThe goals of this study were to critically evaluate the quality of airway management apps and target revised Bloom's Taxonomy cognitive levels.

methodsAn electronic search using the keywords "airway" and "airway management" was conducted in May 2015 across the App Store, Google Play, BlackBerry World, and Windows Store. Apps were included in the study if their content was related to airway management. App content and characteristics were extracted into a standard form and evaluated.

resultsA total of 65 apps met the inclusion criteria, and 73% (47/65) of apps were developed by companies or industry. Anesthesiology trainees were the target audience in only 20% (13/65) of apps. Bag mask ventilation and laryngeal mask airways were covered in only 20% (13/65) of apps. Only 2 apps were supported in the scientific literature. For Bloom's Taxonomy, 37% (24/65) of apps targeted knowledge, 5% (3/65) comprehension, 22% (14/65) application, 28% (18/65) analysis, 9% (6/65) evaluation, and 0% synthesis. Multivariate analysis identified cost of apps, size of apps (MB), and apps targeting trainees and paramedics to be associated with higher levels of cognitive processing of revised Bloom's Taxonomy.

conclusionsApps developed for teaching intubation target lower levels of cognitive processing and are largely not validated by research. Cost, app size, and targeted user are associated with higher cognitive levels. Trainees and all users should be aware of the paucity of the published evidence behind the efficacy of some of these apps.

Indexed as

anesthesiaanesthesiologyappsdifficult airwayeLearningintubationmLearningresidents

Identifiers

PMID28874335
PMCPMC5605758
OpenAlexW2751502839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.