Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28874195›Full record

SynthesisJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2017

Malalignment and malposition of quadriceps-sparing approach in primary total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Fu-Zhen Yuan, Shao-Jie Wang, Zhu-Xing Zhou, Jia-Kuo Yu, Dong Jiang

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. [A prospective randomized controlled study of total knee arthroplasty via mini-subvastus and conventional approach].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2018
    Trial
  4. Does surgical approach affect patient outcomes of total knee arthroplasty?Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie · 2021
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Minimally invasive total knee replacement: techniques and results.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fu-Zhen YuanInstitute of Sports Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, No. 49 North, Garden Road, Haidian, Beijing, 100191, China.
Shao-Jie WangInstitute of Sports Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, No. 49 North, Garden Road, Haidian, Beijing, 100191, China.
Zhu-Xing ZhouInstitute of Sports Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, No. 49 North, Garden Road, Haidian, Beijing, 100191, China.
Jia-Kuo YuInstitute of Sports Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, No. 49 North, Garden Road, Haidian, Beijing, 100191, China. yujiakuo@126.com.
Dong JiangInstitute of Sports Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, No. 49 North, Garden Road, Haidian, Beijing, 100191, China. bysyjiangdong@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundQuadriceps-sparing (QS) approach is considered to be the most minimally invasive surgery for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We perform this meta-analysis to evaluate whether malalignment and malposition are more biased towards the QS approach compared to the traditional medial parapatellar (MP) approach, which is still controversial.

methodsAccording to the PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted in the databases of PubMed, the Cochrane library, and Embase. Relevant measures were extracted independently by two investigators.

resultsFive randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and eight retrospective studies including a total of 1261 cases were identified. The QS approach was associated with more outliers of hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle (p = 0.03), coronal tibial component angle (p = 0.03), and femoral notch (p = 0.05). However, the differences of the outlier of the coronal femoral component angle between the two groups were not statistically significant.

conclusionsThis meta-analysis indicates that the QS approach is related to the high risk of malalignment and malposition. However, different studies reported different indicators resulting in small samples for analyzing the radiological outcomes. In addition, both of the relatively long learning curve and the present instruments might increase the risk of malalignment and malposition of the QS approach, which needs further study and improvement.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeBone MalalignmentHumansKnee arthroplastyMedial parapatellarMeta-analysisMinimally invasiveQuadriceps-sparing

Identifiers

PMID28874195
PMCPMC5585942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.