Observational studyBMC health services research2017
Determinants of first-time utilization of long-term care services in the Netherlands: an observational record linkage study.
Observational study in BMC health services research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Health seeking behaviours among construction workers: a systematic review.BMC public health · 2026Pooled it
- What characterizes first-time use of eldercare? A SNAC Stockholm Eldercare registry-based study of older people's health and care needs in Sweden.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Older people in Sweden increasingly enter long-term care with extensive care needs-a register study of first-time users based on the SNAC Stockholm Eldercare study.European journal of ageing · 2026Article
- Lifetime Healthcare and Long-Term Care Costs of Heart Failure: Estimates Using Administrative Data from Hospitalized Patients in the Netherlands.PharmacoEconomics · 2025Article
- Information sources as determinants of use of formal long-term care: a cross-sectional study in Taiwan.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Non-medical barriers and facilitators of ageing in place: a cohort study in the Netherlands.European journal of ageing · 2025Article
- Socioeconomic Inequity in Access to Medical and Long-Term Care Among Older People.International journal for equity in health · 2025Article
- Use of professional home care in persons with spinal cord injury in Switzerland: a cross-sectional study.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Predictors of long-term care use - informal home care recipients versus private and public facilities residents in Poland.BMC geriatrics · 2023Article
- Preferences in long-term care models and related factors among older adults: a cross-sectional study from Shandong Province, China.European journal of ageing · 2022Article
- Observational
- Social factors influencing utilization of home care in community-dwelling older adults: a scoping review.BMC geriatrics · 2021Article
- Demands for Telenursing-Based Long-Term Care Among Disabled Older Adults in Qingdao, China: A Cross-Sectional Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2021Article
- The impact of frailty on admission to home care services and nursing homes: eight-year follow-up of a community-dwelling, older adult, Spanish cohort.BMC geriatrics · 2020Article
- Can your house keep you out of a nursing home?Health economics · 2020Article
- Long-term care use after a stroke or femoral fracture and the role of family caregivers.BMC geriatrics · 2020Article
- Profile of Long-Term Care Recipients Receiving Home and Community-Based Services and the Factors That Influence Utilization in Taiwan.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Development of a casemix classification to predict costs of home care in the Netherlands: a study protocol.BMJ open · 2020Article
- Formal home care use by older adults: trajectories and determinants in the Lc65+ cohort.BMC health services research · 2020Article
- Referral to the national network of integrated care: the nurses' perception.Revista latino-americana de enfermagem · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSince in an ageing society more long-term care (LTC) facilities are needed, it is important to understand the main determinants of first-time utilization of (LTC) services.
methodsThe Andersen service model, which distinguishes predisposing, enabling and need factors, was used to develop a model for first-time utilization of LTC services among the general population of the Netherlands. We used data on 214,821 persons registered in a database of general practitioners (NIVEL Primary Care Database). For each person the medical history was known, as well as characteristics such as ethnicity, income, home-ownership, and marital status. Utilization data from the national register on long-term care was linked at a personal level. Generalized Linear Models were used to determine the relative importance of factors of incident LTC-service utilization.
resultsTop 5 determinants of LTC are need, measured as the presence of chronic diseases, age, household size, household income and homeownership. When controlling for all other determinants, the presence of an additional chronic disease increases the probability of utilizing any LTC service by 45% among the 20+ population (OR = 1.45, 95% CI: 1.41-1.49), and 31% among the 65+ population (OR = 1.31, 95% CI: 1.27-1.36). With respect to the 20+ population, living in social rent (OR = 2.45, 95% CI = 2.25-2.67, ref. = home-owner) had a large impact on utilizing any LTC service. In a lesser degree this was the case for living alone (OR = 1.63, 95% CI = 1.52-1.75, ref. = not living alone). A higher household income was linked with a lower utilization of any LTC service.
conclusionsAll three factors of the Anderson model, predisposing, enabling, and need determinants influence the likelihood of future LTC service utilization. This implies that none of these factors can be left out of the analysis of what determines this use. New in our analysis is the focus on incident utilization. This provides a better estimate of the effects of predictors than a prevalence based analysis, as there is less confounding by changes in determinants occurring after LTC initiation. Especially the need of care is a strong factor. A policy implication of this relative importance of health status is therefore that LTC reforms should take health aspects into account.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.