Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28874178›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2017

Relationship between self-efficacy and patient knowledge on adherence to oral contraceptives using the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8).

Daniel Tomaszewski, Benjamin D Aronson, Margarette Kading, Donald Morisky

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05973071 (Clinical Use of a Contraceptive Decision Aid and Patient Outcomes), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05973071 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Clinical Use of a Contraceptive Decision Aid and Patient Outcomes: An Experimental Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorTexas Christian UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled400ConditionsContraceptive UsageArmsTuune Supplemented Contraceptive Visit, Traditional Contraceptive Visit
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Family Planning Reminder Systems: An Updated Systematic Review.American journal of preventive medicine · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Medication Adherence and Contraceptive Counseling.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Associations Among HIV Risk Perception, Sexual Health Efficacy, and Intent to Use PrEP Among Women: An Application of the Risk Perception Attitude Framework.AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel TomaszewskiChapman University School of Pharmacy, 9401 Jeronimo Rd, Irvine, California, 92618, USA.
Benjamin D AronsonOhio Northern University Raabe College of Pharmacy, 525 S Main St, Ada, OH, 45810, USA. b-aronson.1@onu.edu.
Margarette KadingCollege of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, 232 Life Sciences, 1110 Kirby Dr, Duluth, MN, 55812, USA.
Donald MoriskyUCLA Fielding School of Public Health, 650 Charles E. Young Dr. South, 16-035 Center for Health Sciences, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1772, USA.
Chapman University · USOhio Northern University · USUniversity of Minnesota, Duluth · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreconception care, including family planning, is a vital component of healthcare for women of reproductive age. An average female spends the majority of her reproductive life trying to prevent a pregnancy. In order to prevent unintended pregnancy, women often rely on the use of hormonal contraceptives. In the United States, the majority of hormonal contraceptive users are prescribed oral contraceptive pills (OCPs). Reduced adherence to OCPs decreases their ability to prevent pregnancy. The study aimed to measure OCP adherence among female college students, and explore the relationship between OCP adherence, knowledge, and self-efficacy.

methodsThis cross-sectional study recruited a random sample of female college students to participate in an online survey. OCP adherence was based on the 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8). Secondary reporting of medication adherence included participant reports of the number of missed OCP doses in the previous month and typical month of use.

resultsOf the 5000 invited, 1559 (31.3%) completed the survey. Of those responding, 670 (41.3%) reported use of OCPs. A total of 293 (44.3%) OCP users met criteria for low adherence, 241 (36.4%) met criteria for medium adherence, and 128 (19.3%) met criteria for high adherence. Those with high adherence had higher self-efficacy (P < 0.001) and perceived knowledge (p < 0.001). After controlling for other factors, self-efficacy (b = .37) and perceived knowledge (b = .09) remained associated with OCP adherence.

conclusionLess than 20% of respondents met the criteria for high adherence to OCPs. Self-efficacy and knowledge were associated with higher OCP adherence. Targeted interventions from healthcare providers, health educators, and other adherence related media to increase the knowledge and self-efficacy of patients using OCPs may improve adherence rates. Additional research is needed to evaluate the impact of innovative interventions focused on social and behavioral patient factors, like knowledge and self-efficacy, on adherence to OCPs.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultContraceptives, OralCross-Sectional StudiesFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHumansPatient ComplianceUnited StatesContraceptives, OralCollege studentsKnowledgeOral contraceptive adherenceOral contraceptive pillSelf-efficacy

Identifiers

PMID28874178
PMCPMC5585984
OpenAlexW2752005290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.