Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28874144›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2017

Circadian disruption promotes tumor growth by anabolic host metabolism; experimental evidence in a rat model.

Natalí N Guerrero-Vargas, Raful Navarro-Espíndola, Mara A Guzmán-Ruíz, María Del Carmen Basualdo, Estefania Espitia-Bautista, Ana López-Bago, Ricardo Lascurain, Cinthya Córdoba-Manilla, Ruud M Buijs, Carolina Escobar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Light Pollution and Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Natalí N Guerrero-VargasDepartamento de Anatomía, Facultad de Medicina, UNAM, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, 04510, México City, Mexico.
Raful Navarro-EspíndolaDepartamento de Anatomía, Facultad de Medicina, UNAM, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, 04510, México City, Mexico.
Mara A Guzmán-RuízDepartamento de Anatomía, Facultad de Medicina, UNAM, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, 04510, México City, Mexico.
María Del Carmen BasualdoDepartamento de Biología Celular y Fisiología, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 04510, Mexico City, CP, Mexico.
Estefania Espitia-BautistaDepartamento de Anatomía, Facultad de Medicina, UNAM, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, 04510, México City, Mexico.
Ana López-BagoDepartamento de Bioquímica, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 04510, Mexico City, CP, Mexico.
Ricardo LascurainDepartamento de Bioquímica, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 04510, Mexico City, CP, Mexico.
Cinthya Córdoba-ManillaDepartamento de Anatomía, Facultad de Medicina, UNAM, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, 04510, México City, Mexico.
Ruud M BuijsDepartamento de Biología Celular y Fisiología, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 04510, Mexico City, CP, Mexico.
Carolina EscobarDepartamento de Anatomía, Facultad de Medicina, UNAM, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, 04510, México City, Mexico. escocarolina@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2974-7875
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLight at night creates a conflicting signal to the biological clock and disrupts circadian physiology. In rodents, light at night increases the risk to develop mood disorders, overweight, disrupted energy metabolism, immune dysfunction and cancer. We hypothesized that constant light (LL) in rats may facilitate tumor growth via disrupted metabolism and increased inflammatory response in the host, inducing a propitious microenvironment for tumor cells.

methodsMale Wistar rats were exposed to LL or a regular light-dark cycle (LD) for 5 weeks. Body weight gain, food consumption, triglycerides and glucose blood levels were evaluated; a glucose tolerance test was also performed. Inflammation and sickness behavior were evaluated after the administration of intravenous lipopolysaccharide. Tumors were induced by subcutaneous inoculation of glioma cells (C6). In tumor-bearing rats, the metabolic state and immune cells infiltration to the tumor was investigated by using immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry. The mRNA expression of genes involved metabolic, growth, angiogenes and inflammatory pathways was measured in the tumor microenvironment by qPCR. Tumor growth was also evaluated in animals fed with a high sugar diet.

resultsWe found that LL induced overweight, high plasma triglycerides and glucose levels as well as reduced glucose clearance. In response to an LPS challenge, LL rats responded with higher pro-inflammatory cytokines and exacerbated sickness behavior. Tumor cell inoculation resulted in increased tumor volume in LL as compared with LD rats, associated with high blood glucose levels and decreased triglycerides levels in the host. More macrophages were recruited in the LL tumor and the microenvironment was characterized by upregulation of genes involved in lipogenesis (Acaca, Fasn, and Pparγ), glucose uptake (Glut-1), and tumor growth (Vegfα, Myc, Ir) suggesting that LL tumors rely on these processes in order to support their enhanced growth. Genes related with the inflammatory state in the tumor microenvironment were not different between LL and LD conditions. In rats fed a high caloric diet tumor growth was similar to LL conditions.

conclusionsData indicates that circadian disruption by LL provides a favorable condition for tumor growth by promoting an anabolic metabolism in the host.

Indexed as

Circadian RhythmEnergy MetabolismAnimalsBiomarkersBody TemperatureDisease Models, AnimalGlucoseHeterograftsHumansInflammationLeukocyte CountMacrophagesMaleMotor ActivityNeoplasmsPhotoperiodBiomarkersGlucoseCircadian disruptionInflammationLight at nightMetabolism and obesityTumor development

Identifiers

PMID28874144
PMCPMC5585981
OpenAlexW2751150650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.