ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2017
An ImmunoSignature test distinguishes Trypanosoma cruzi, hepatitis B, hepatitis C and West Nile virus seropositivity among asymptomatic blood donors.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Identification of Dual T-Cell and B-Cell Epitopes Within Viral Proteins Utilizing a Comprehensive Peptide Array Approach.Vaccines · 2025Article
- Serologic biomarker discovery for differentiating Lyme disease from diseases with similar clinical symptoms using broad profiling of antibody binding.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Highly heterogenous humoral immune response in Lyme disease patients revealed by broad machine learning-assisted antibody binding profiling with random peptide arrays.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Modeling the sequence dependence of differential antibody binding in the immune response to infectious disease.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Predicting response and toxicity to immune checkpoint inhibitors in lung cancer using antibodies to frameshift neoantigens.Journal of translational medicine · 2023Article
- Protective antigenic epitopes revealed by immunosignatures after three doses of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- Serological Approaches for Trypanosoma cruzi Strain Typing.Trends in parasitology · 2021Review
- Production of high-complexity frameshift neoantigen peptide microarrays.RSC advances · 2020Article
- Age-associated changes in the circulating human antibody repertoire are upregulated in autoimmunity.Immunity & ageing : I & A · 2020Article
- Antibody characterization using immunosignatures.PloS one · 2020Article
- Correction: An ImmunoSignature test distinguishes Trypanosoma cruzi, hepatitis B, hepatitis C and West Nile virus seropositivity among asymptomatic blood donors.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe complexity of the eukaryotic parasite Trypanosoma (T.) cruzi manifests in its highly dynamic genome, multi-host life cycle, progressive morphologies and immune-evasion mechanisms. Accurate determination of infection or Chagas' disease activity and prognosis continues to challenge researchers. We hypothesized that a diagnostic platform with higher ligand complexity than previously employed may hold value. METHODOLOGY: We applied the ImmunoSignature Technology (IST) for the detection of T. cruzi-specific antibodies among healthy blood donors. IST is based on capturing the information in an individual's antibody repertoire by exposing their peripheral blood to a library of >100,000 position-addressable, chemically-diverse peptides. PRINCIPAL
findingsInitially, samples from two Chagas cohorts declared positive or negative by bank testing were studied. With the first cohort, library-peptides displaying differential binding signals between T. cruzi sero-states were used to train an algorithm. A classifier was fixed and tested against the training-independent second cohort to determine assay performance. Next, samples from a mixed cohort of donors declared positive for Chagas, hepatitis B, hepatitis C or West Nile virus were assayed on the same library. Signals were used to train a single algorithm that distinguished all four disease states. As a binary test, the accuracy of predicting T. cruzi seropositivity by IST was similar, perhaps modestly reduced, relative to conventional ELISAs. However, the results indicate that information beyond determination of seropositivity may have been captured. These include the identification of cohort subclasses, the simultaneous detection and discerning of other diseases, and the discovery of putative new antigens. CONCLUSIONS & SIGNIFICANCE: The central outcome of this study established IST as a reliable approach for specific determination of T. cruzi seropositivity versus disease-free individuals or those with other diseases. Its potential contribution for monitoring and controlling Chagas lies in IST's delivery of higher resolution immune-state readouts than obtained with currently-used technologies. Despite the complexity of the ligand presentation and large quantitative readouts, performing an IST test is simple, scalable and reproducible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.