Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28873400›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2017

SisLeish: A multi-country standardized information system to monitor the status of Leishmaniasis in the Americas.

Ana N S Maia-Elkhoury, Samantha Y O B Valadas, Lia Puppim-Buzanovsky, Felipe Rocha, Manuel J Sanchez-Vazquez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Imported cases of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Cuba, 2017: role of human movement.Tropical diseases, travel medicine and vaccines · 2022
    Article
  8. A critical review of the applicability of serological screening for Leishmaniasis in blood banks in Brazil.Journal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2021
    Review
  9. Interaction between environmental and socioeconomic determinants for cutaneous leishmaniasis risk in Latin America.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ana N S Maia-ElkhouryCommunicable Diseases and Health Analysis (CHA), VT, Pan American Health Organization (PAHO), Duque de Caxias, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5369-5860
Samantha Y O B ValadasCommunicable Diseases and Health Analysis (CHA), VT, Pan American Health Organization (PAHO), Duque de Caxias, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Lia Puppim-BuzanovskyCommunicable Diseases and Health Analysis (CHA), Panaftosa, Pan American Health Organization (PAHO), Duque de Caxias, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Felipe RochaCommunicable Diseases and Health Analysis (CHA), Panaftosa, Pan American Health Organization (PAHO), Duque de Caxias, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Manuel J Sanchez-VazquezCommunicable Diseases and Health Analysis (CHA), Panaftosa, Pan American Health Organization (PAHO), Duque de Caxias, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the Americas, leishmaniasis is endemic in 18 countries, and from 2001 through 2015, 17 countries reported 843,931 cases of cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis, and 12 countries reported 52,176 cases of visceral leishmaniasis. A Regional Information System (SisLeish) was created in order to provide knowledge of the distribution and tendency of this disease to analyze and monitor the leishmaniasis status. This article analyses the performance and progress of SisLeish from 2012-2015. METHODOLOGY: The performance of SisLeish was evaluated by country adhesion, data completeness and delay in entering the data, and also by the SWOT technique. Furthermore, we outlined the structure and modus operandi of the system and indicators utilized.

resultsIn 2012, only 18% of the countries entered the data in SisLeish before the deadline, where 66.7% and 50% of the countries with autochthonous CL/ML and VL reported their cases to the system, respectively. Whereas in 2015, 59% of the countries reached the deadline, where 94.4% and 58.3% of the countries reported their CL/ML and VL data, respectively. Regarding data completeness, there was great progress for different variables since its launch, such as gender, which had an approximately 100% improvement from 2012 to 2015. The SWOT analysis of SisLeish showed 12 strengths, 11 opportunities, seven weaknesses and six threats.

conclusionsFrom 2012-2015 there has been an improvement in the adhesion, quality and data completeness, showing the effort of the majority of the countries to enhance their national database. The SWOT analysis demonstrated that strengths and opportunities exceed weaknesses and threats; however, it highlighted the system frailties and challenges that need to be addressed. Furthermore, it has stimulated several National Programs to advance their surveillance system. Therefore, SisLeish has become an essential tool to prioritize areas, assist in decision-making processes, and to guide surveillance and control actions.

Indexed as

Epidemiological MonitoringHealth Services ResearchAmericasHumansInformation SystemsInternational CooperationLeishmaniasis

Identifiers

PMID28873400
PMCPMC5600406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.