Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28873399›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2017

Systematic analysis of transcription start sites in avian development.

Marina Lizio, Ruslan Deviatiiarov, Hiroki Nagai, Laura Galan, Erik Arner, Masayoshi Itoh, Timo Lassmann, Takeya Kasukawa, Akira Hasegawa, Marian A Ros and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Interaction Between Enhancers and Promoters in Chicken Genome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  2. Prediction of Enhancer RNAs in Chicken Genome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Fourth Report on Chicken Genes and Chromosomes 2022.Cytogenetic and genome research · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Marina LizioDivision of Genomic Technologies, RIKEN Center for Life Science Technologies (CLST), Yokohama, Japan.
Ruslan DeviatiiarovInstitute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Russia.
Hiroki NagaiInternational Research Center for Medical Sciences (IRCMS), Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Laura GalanInstituto de Biomedicina y Biotecnología de Cantabria, IBBTEC (CSIC-Universidad de Cantabria-SODERCAN), Santander, Spain.
Erik ArnerDivision of Genomic Technologies, RIKEN Center for Life Science Technologies (CLST), Yokohama, Japan.
Masayoshi ItohDivision of Genomic Technologies, RIKEN Center for Life Science Technologies (CLST), Yokohama, Japan.
Timo LassmannDivision of Genomic Technologies, RIKEN Center for Life Science Technologies (CLST), Yokohama, Japan.
Takeya KasukawaDivision of Genomic Technologies, RIKEN Center for Life Science Technologies (CLST), Yokohama, Japan.
Akira HasegawaDivision of Genomic Technologies, RIKEN Center for Life Science Technologies (CLST), Yokohama, Japan.
Marian A RosInstituto de Biomedicina y Biotecnología de Cantabria, IBBTEC (CSIC-Universidad de Cantabria-SODERCAN), Santander, Spain.
Yoshihide HayashizakiRIKEN Omics Science Center (OSC), Yokohama, Japan.
Piero CarninciDivision of Genomic Technologies, RIKEN Center for Life Science Technologies (CLST), Yokohama, Japan.
Alistair R R ForrestDivision of Genomic Technologies, RIKEN Center for Life Science Technologies (CLST), Yokohama, Japan.
Hideya KawajiDivision of Genomic Technologies, RIKEN Center for Life Science Technologies (CLST), Yokohama, Japan.
Oleg GusevDivision of Genomic Technologies, RIKEN Center for Life Science Technologies (CLST), Yokohama, Japan.
Guojun ShengInternational Research Center for Medical Sciences (IRCMS), Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6759-3785

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cap Analysis of Gene Expression (CAGE) in combination with single-molecule sequencing technology allows precision mapping of transcription start sites (TSSs) and genome-wide capture of promoter activities in differentiated and steady state cell populations. Much less is known about whether TSS profiling can characterize diverse and non-steady state cell populations, such as the approximately 400 transitory and heterogeneous cell types that arise during ontogeny of vertebrate animals. To gain such insight, we used the chick model and performed CAGE-based TSS analysis on embryonic samples covering the full 3-week developmental period. In total, 31,863 robust TSS peaks (>1 tag per million [TPM]) were mapped to the latest chicken genome assembly, of which 34% to 46% were active in any given developmental stage. ZENBU, a web-based, open-source platform, was used for interactive data exploration. TSSs of genes critical for lineage differentiation could be precisely mapped and their activities tracked throughout development, suggesting that non-steady state and heterogeneous cell populations are amenable to CAGE-based transcriptional analysis. Our study also uncovered a large set of extremely stable housekeeping TSSs and many novel stage-specific ones. We furthermore demonstrated that TSS mapping could expedite motif-based promoter analysis for regulatory modules associated with stage-specific and housekeeping genes. Finally, using Brachyury as an example, we provide evidence that precise TSS mapping in combination with Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeat (CRISPR)-on technology enables us, for the first time, to efficiently target endogenous avian genes for transcriptional activation. Taken together, our results represent the first report of genome-wide TSS mapping in birds and the first systematic developmental TSS analysis in any amniote species (birds and mammals). By facilitating promoter-based molecular analysis and genetic manipulation, our work also underscores the value of avian models in unravelling the complex regulatory mechanism of cell lineage specification during amniote development.

Indexed as

Embryonic DevelopmentGenome-Wide Association StudyTranscription Initiation SiteAnimalsBiological EvolutionChick EmbryoClustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats

Identifiers

PMID28873399
PMCPMC5600399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.