Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28873396›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

A mouse mastitis model to study the effects of the intramammary infusion of a food-grade Lactococcus lactis strain.

Cristina Camperio, Federica Armas, Elena Biasibetti, Paolo Frassanito, Carlo Giovannelli, Liliana Spuria, Claudia D'Agostino, Sabrina Tait, Maria Teresa Capucchio, Cinzia Marianelli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Akkermansia muciniphila-Derived Outer Membrane Vesicles as a Novel Therapeutic Approach for Mastitis: Insights From In Vitro and Vivo Studies.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. The preventive effect of probioticFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  9. Non-Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  10. mSystems · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Lactococcus lactis, a bacterium with probiotic functions and pathogenicity.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Frontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  18. Phage vB_PaeS-PAJD-1 Rescues Murine Mastitis Infected With Multidrug-ResistantFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Cristina CamperioDepartment of Food Safety and Veterinary Public Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Federica ArmasDepartment of Food Safety and Veterinary Public Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Elena BiasibettiDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Paolo FrassanitoDepartment of Food Safety and Veterinary Public Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Carlo GiovannelliDepartment of Food Safety and Veterinary Public Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Liliana SpuriaDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Claudia D'AgostinoDepartment of Food Safety and Veterinary Public Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Sabrina TaitCenter for Gender-Specific Medicine, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Maria Teresa CapucchioDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Cinzia MarianelliDepartment of Food Safety and Veterinary Public Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5190-4574
Istituto Superiore di Sanità · ITUniversity of Turin · ITRoma Tre University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lactococcus lactis is one of the most important microorganisms in the dairy industry and has "generally recognized as safe" (GRAS) status. L. lactis belongs to the group of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and is encountered in a wide range of environments. Recently, the use of the intramammary infusion of a live culture of LAB has been investigated as a new antibiotic alternative for treating mastitis in dairy ruminants. Controversial results are described in literature regarding its efficacy and safety. In this study we conducted in-depth investigation of the mammary gland immune response induced by intramammary inoculum of a live culture of L. lactis LMG 7930 using the mouse mastitis model. Overnight cultures either of L. lactis (≈ 107 CFU) or of the mastitis pathogens Staphylococcus chromogenes (≈ 105 CFU) or S. aureus (≈ 102 CFU/ml) were injected into the mouse inguinal glands. A double injection, consisting of S. chromogenes first and then L. lactis, was also investigated. Bacterial recovery from the gland and inflammatory cell infiltration were assessed. L. lactis-treated and control glands were analysed for proinflammatory cytokine production. Microbiological results showed that L. lactis was able to survive in the mammary gland 24 h post infection, as were the mastitis pathogens S. chromogenes and S. aureus. L. lactis reduced S. chromogenes survival in the glands and increased its own survival ability by coexisting with the pathogen. Histology showed that L. lactis-treated glands presented variable histological features, ranging from undamaged tissue with no inflammatory cell infiltrate to severe PMN infiltrate with focal areas of tissue damage. S. aureus-treated glands showed the most severe histological grade of inflammation despite the fact that the inoculum size was the smallest. In contrast, most S. chromogenes-treated glands showed normal structures with no infiltration or lesions. Significant increases in IL-1β and TNF-α levels were also found in L. lactis-inoculated glands. The above findings seem to suggest that food-grade L. lactis at a high-inoculum dose such as an overnight culture may elicit a suppurative inflammatory response in the mammary gland, thus becoming a potential mastitis-causing pathogen. Because of the unpredictable potential of L. lactis in acting as a potential mastitis pathogen, this organism cannot be considered a safe treatment for bovine mastitis.

Indexed as

AnimalsCytokinesDisease Models, AnimalFemaleInflammation MediatorsLactococcus lactisMammary Glands, AnimalMastitisMiceCytokinesInflammation Mediators

Identifiers

PMID28873396
PMCPMC5584933
OpenAlexW2751838801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.