Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28873121›Full record

ReviewJAMA pediatrics2017

Truth Telling in the Setting of Cultural Differences and Incurable Pediatric Illness: A Review.

Abby R Rosenberg, Helene Starks, Yoram Unguru, Chris Feudtner, Douglas Diekema

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JAMA pediatrics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Hope pluralism in antenatal palliative care.Journal of medical ethics · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Incorporating gonadal health counseling into pediatric care of sickle cell patients.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Exploring medical ethics' implementation challenges: A qualitative study.Journal of education and health promotion · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Abby R RosenbergSeattle Children's Hospital, Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Seattle, Washington.
Helene StarksSeattle Children's Research Institute, Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle, Washington.
Yoram UnguruDivision of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, The Herman and Walter Samuelson Children's Hospital at Sinai, Baltimore, Maryland.
Chris FeudtnerDepartment of Medical Ethics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Douglas DiekemaSeattle Children's Research Institute, Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle, Washington.

Funding

NCCIH Supplement to NCATS/CTSA Program for KL2 Scholars - M. SoddersKL2TR002317 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Christy Michelle McKinney · 2017 to 2026
$14.5M
Institute of Translational Health SciencesKL2TR000421 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DISIS, MARY L. · 2012 to 2016
$12.6M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000421NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002317
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Navigating requests from parents or family caregivers not to disclose poor prognosis to seriously ill children can be challenging, especially when the requests seem culturally mediated. Pediatric clinicians must balance obligations to respect individual patient autonomy, professional truth telling, and tolerance of multicultural values. Observations: To provide suggestions for respectful and ethically appropriate responses to nondisclosure requests, we used a hypothetical case example of a Middle Eastern adolescent patient with incurable cancer and conducted an ethical analysis incorporating (1) evidence from both Western and Middle Eastern medical literature and (2) theories of cultural relativism and justice. While Western medical literature tends to prioritize patient autonomy and corresponding truth telling, the weight of evidence from the Middle East suggests high variability between and within individual countries, patient-physician relationships, and families regarding truth-telling practices and preferences. A common reason for nondisclosure in both populations is protecting the child from distressing information. Cultural relativism fosters tolerance of diverse beliefs and behaviors by forbidding judgment on foreign societal codes of conduct. It does not justify assumptions that all individuals within a single culture share the same values, nor does it demand that clinicians sacrifice their own codes of conduct out of cultural respect. We suggest some phrases that may help clinicians explore motivations behind nondisclosure requests and gently confront conflict in order to serve the patient's best interest. Conclusions and Relevance: It is sometimes ethically permissible to defer to family values regarding nondisclosure, but such deferral is not unique to cultural differences. Early setting of expectations and boundaries, as well as ongoing exploration of family and health care professional concerns, may mitigate conflict.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessCultural CharacteristicsAdolescentChildCulturally Competent CareHumansMiddle EastPediatricsProfessional-Family RelationsTruth DisclosureUnited States

Identifiers

PMID28873121
PMCPMC5675758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.