ArticlePLoS biology2017
Identifying genetic variants that affect viability in large cohorts.
Article in PLoS biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.
- Detecting fitness epistasis in recently admixed populations with genome-wide data.BMC genomics · 2020Pooled it
- A Prospective Analysis of Genetic Variants Associated with Human Lifespan.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2019Pooled it
- Genomic insights into natural selection in recent human history.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- Divergent biological consequences of APOE isoforms across industrialized and non-industrial environments.PLoS genetics · 2026Article
- Evolutionary genetics of ageing.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- Allele frequency trajectories across age groups reveal ongoing natural selection shaping disease susceptibility.American journal of human genetics · 2026Article
- An evaluation of age-varying genetic effects underlying body-mass index and blood pressure in the UK Biobank.PLoS genetics · 2026Article
- Divergent Biological Consequences of APOE Isoforms Across Industrialized and Non-Industrial Environments.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- The genetics of extrinsic postzygotic selection in a migratory divide between subspecies of the Swainson's thrush.Nature communications · 2025Article
- The Great Genotyper: a graph-based method for population genotyping of small and structural variants.GigaScience · 2025Article
- Polygenic prediction of human longevity on the supposition of pervasive pleiotropy.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Effect of apolipoprotein E ε4 and its modification by sociodemographic characteristics on cognitive measures in South Asians from LASI-DAD.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024Article
- Unveiling recent and ongoing adaptive selection in human populations.PLoS biology · 2024Article
- Polygenic prediction of human longevity on the supposition of pervasive pleiotropy.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023Article
- The evolution of aging and lifespan.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2023Review
- Article
- Inferring the mode and strength of ongoing selection.Genome research · 2023Article
- The importance of elders: Extending Hamilton's force of selection to include intergenerational transfers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- The relative fitness of the de novo variants in general Lithuanian population vs. in individuals with intellectual disability.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2022Article
- Comparison of the fertility of tumor suppressor gene-deficient C57BL/6 mouse strains reveals stable reproductive aging and novel pleiotropic gene.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
A number of open questions in human evolutionary genetics would become tractable if we were able to directly measure evolutionary fitness. As a step towards this goal, we developed a method to examine whether individual genetic variants, or sets of genetic variants, currently influence viability. The approach consists in testing whether the frequency of an allele varies across ages, accounting for variation in ancestry. We applied it to the Genetic Epidemiology Research on Adult Health and Aging (GERA) cohort and to the parents of participants in the UK Biobank. Across the genome, we found only a few common variants with large effects on age-specific mortality: tagging the APOE ε4 allele and near CHRNA3. These results suggest that when large, even late-onset effects are kept at low frequency by purifying selection. Testing viability effects of sets of genetic variants that jointly influence 1 of 42 traits, we detected a number of strong signals. In participants of the UK Biobank of British ancestry, we found that variants that delay puberty timing are associated with a longer parental life span (P~6.2 × 10-6 for fathers and P~2.0 × 10-3 for mothers), consistent with epidemiological studies. Similarly, variants associated with later age at first birth are associated with a longer maternal life span (P~1.4 × 10-3). Signals are also observed for variants influencing cholesterol levels, risk of coronary artery disease (CAD), body mass index, as well as risk of asthma. These signals exhibit consistent effects in the GERA cohort and among participants of the UK Biobank of non-British ancestry. We also found marked differences between males and females, most notably at the CHRNA3 locus, and variants associated with risk of CAD and cholesterol levels. Beyond our findings, the analysis serves as a proof of principle for how upcoming biomedical data sets can be used to learn about selection effects in contemporary humans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.