Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28872681›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology2017

Development of a direct contact astrocyte-human cerebral microvessel endothelial cells blood-brain barrier coculture model.

Chris Kulczar, Kelsey E Lubin, Sylvia Lefebvre, Donald W Miller, Gregory T Knipp

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. 3DFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. HumanTissue barriers · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. 3D In Vitro Blood-Brain-Barrier Model for Investigating Barrier Insults.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Vascularizing the brainiScience · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chris KulczarDepartment of Industrial and Physical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Kelsey E LubinDepartment of Industrial and Physical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Sylvia LefebvreDepartment of Industrial and Physical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Donald W MillerDepartment of Pharmacology & Therapeutics, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Gregory T KnippDepartment of Industrial and Physical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.

Funding

Characterization of Human GI Oligopeptide TransportersR01GM065448 · NIGMS · RUTGERS THE ST UNIV OF NJ NEW BRUNSWICK · PI KNIPP, GREGORY T · 2003 to 2008
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM065448
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIn conventional in-vitro blood-brain barrier (BBB) models, primary and immortalized brain microvessel endothelial cell (BMEC) lines are often cultured in a monolayer or indirect coculture or triculture configurations with astrocytes or pericytes, for screening permeation of therapeutic or potentially neurotoxic compounds. In each of these cases, the physiological relevancy associated with the direct contact between the BMECs, pericytes and astrocytes that form the BBB and resulting synergistic interactions are lost. We look to overcome this limitation with a direct contact coculture model.

methodsWe established and optimized a direct interaction coculture system where primary human astrocytes are cultured on the apical surface of a Transwell® filter support and then human cerebral microvessel endothelial cells (hCMEC/D3) seeded directly on the astrocyte lawn. KEY

findingsThe studies suggest the direct coculture model may provide a more restrictive and physiologically relevant model through a significant reduction in paracellular transport of model compounds in comparison with monoculture and indirect coculture. In comparison with existing methods, the indirect coculture and monoculture models utilized may limit cell-cell signaling between human astrocytes and BMECs that are possible with direct configurations.

conclusionsParacellular permeability reductions with the direct coculture system may enhance therapeutic agent and potential neurotoxicant screening for BBB permeability better than the currently available monoculture and indirect coculture in-vitro models.

Indexed as

AstrocytesBlood-Brain BarrierCerebrovascular CirculationCoculture TechniquesEndothelial CellsEndothelium, VascularHumansMicrovesselsPermeabilityblood-brain barrier coculturehuman astrocyteshuman cerebral microvessel endothelial cellsparacellular permeability

Identifiers

PMID28872681
PMCPMC7938951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.