ReviewCurrent opinion in organ transplantation2017
Lung xenotransplantation.
Review in Current opinion in organ transplantation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Surgeons are apprehensive to use DCD lungs despite similar post-transplant outcomes: A 20-year UNOS retrospective analysis.JHLT open · 2025Article
- Emerging Paradigms in Bioengineering the Lungs.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Characterization of Mono- and Bi-Transgenic Pig-Derived Epidermal Keratinocytes Expressing HumanInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Xenotransplantation: Current Status in Preclinical Research.Frontiers in immunology · 2019Review
- Antigenicity of tissues and organs from GGTA1/CMAH/β4GalNT2 triple gene knockout pigs.Journal of biomedical research · 2018Article
- Remaining Physiological Barriers in Porcine Kidney Xenotransplantation: Potential Pathways behind Proteinuria as well as Factors Related to Growth Discrepancies following Pig-to-Kidney Xenotransplantation.Journal of immunology research · 2018Review
- Recent advances in lung transplantation.F1000Research · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis review describes the most recent progress in xeno lung transplantation (XLTx) to date. It describes the potential mechanisms of early xeno lung graft loss, as well as the latest therapeutic strategies to overcome them. RECENT
findingsUsing ex-vivo perfusion models of porcine lungs with human blood, the use of genetically modified pig lungs along with novel pharmaceutical approaches has recently been studied. Strategies that have demonstrated improved lung survival include the knockout of known xenoantigens (GalTKO and N-glycolylneuraminic acid-KO), genes that regulate complement activation (hCD46 and hCD55), as well as the inflammation/coagulation cascade (human leukocyte antigen-E, human thrombomodulin, human endothelial protein C receptor, hCD47, hCD39, hCD73 and heme oxygenase-1). Furthermore, pharmacologic interventions including the depletion of pulmonary intravascular macrophages or von Willebrand factor, inhibition of thromboxane synthase and blockade of histamine receptors have also demonstrated protective effects on xeno lung grafts. Using in-vivo pig to nonhuman primate lung transplant models, these approaches have been shown to extend pulmonary xenograft survival to 5 days. SUMMARY: The development of new multitransgenic GalTKO pigs has demonstrated prolongation of porcine xenograft survival; however, advancement in XLTx has remained frustratingly limited. Further intensive and innovative strategies including genetic manipulation of donors, as well as inflammation/coagulation dysregulation, are required to make XLTx a clinical possibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.