Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28872273›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the International AIDS Society2017

Identification of misdiagnosed HIV clients in an Early Access to ART for All implementation study in Swaziland.

Shaukat Khan, Emma Mafara, Munyaradzi Pasipamire, Donna Spiegelman, Sikhathele Mazibuko, Nombuso Ntshalintshali, Anita Hettema, Charlotte Lejeune, Fiona Walsh, Velephi Okello

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shaukat KhanClinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI), Mbabane, Swaziland.
Emma MafaraClinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI), Mbabane, Swaziland.
Munyaradzi PasipamireDepartment of Epidemiology, Ministry of Health, Mbabane, Swaziland.
Donna SpiegelmanHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Sikhathele MazibukoDepartment of Epidemiology, Ministry of Health, Mbabane, Swaziland.
Nombuso NtshalintshaliClinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI), Mbabane, Swaziland.
Anita HettemaClinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI), Mbabane, Swaziland.
Charlotte LejeuneClinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI), Mbabane, Swaziland.
Fiona WalshClinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI), Boston, MA, USA.
Velephi OkelloDepartment of Epidemiology, Ministry of Health, Mbabane, Swaziland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRapid diagnostic testing has made HIV diagnosis and subsequent treatment more accessible. However, multiple factors, including improper implementation of testing strategies and clerical errors, have been reported to lead to HIV misdiagnosis. The World Health Organization has recommended HIV retesting prior to antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation which has become pertinent with scaling up of Early Access to ART for All (EAAA). In this analysis, misdiagnosed clients are identified from a subgroup of clients enrolled in EAAA implementation study in Swaziland.

methodsThe subgroup to assess misdiagnosis was identified from enrolled EAAA study clients, who had an undetectable viral load prior to ART initiation between September 1, 2014 and May 31, 2016. One hundred and five of 2533 (4%) clients had an undetectable viral load prior to initiation to ART (pre-ART). The HIV status of clients was confirmed using the Determine HIV 1/2 and Uni-Gold HIV 1/2 rapid tests performed serially as recommended by the national testing algorithm. The status of clients on ART was additionally confirmed by fourth-generation HIV Ag/Ab combo tests, Architect and Genscreen Ultra.

resultsFourteen of the 105 (13%) clients were false positive (HIV negative) on confirmation testing, of whom five (36%) were still in pre-ART care, while nine (64%) were in ART care. Overall, proportion of false positive was 0.6% (14/2533). The false-positive clients had a median CD4 of 791 cells/ml (interquartile range (IQR): 628, 967) compared to 549 cells/ml (IQR: 387, 791) for true positives (HIV positive) (

conclusionsOverall 0.6% of all enrolled EAAA clients were misdiagnosed, and 64% of misdiagnosed clients were initiated on ART. With adoption of EAAA guidelines by national governments, ART initiation regardless of immunological criteria, strengthening of proficiency testing and adoption of retesting prior to ART initiation would allow identification of misdiagnosed clients and further reduce potential of initiating misdiagnosed clients on ART.

Indexed as

AdultAntibodies, ViralAnti-HIV AgentsCD4 Lymphocyte CountDiagnostic ErrorsEswatiniFemaleHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedTime FactorsViral LoadYoung AdultAntibodies, ViralAnti-HIV AgentsEarly Access to ART for AllHIV false positiveHIV misdiagnosisHIV testingSwazilandtreatment for allUniversal test and treat

Identifiers

PMID28872273
PMCPMC5625592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.