Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28872144›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2017

Volume Segmentation and Analysis of Biological Materials Using SuRVoS (Super-region Volume Segmentation) Workbench.

Michele C Darrow, Imanol Luengo, Mark Basham, Matthew C Spink, Sarah Irvine, Andrew P French, Alun W Ashton, Elizabeth M H Duke

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Michele C DarrowScience Division, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Diamond Light Source; michele.darrow@diamond.ac.uk.
Imanol LuengoScience Division, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Diamond Light Source; School of Computer Science, University of Nottingham.
Mark BashamScience Division, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Diamond Light Source.
Matthew C SpinkScience Division, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Diamond Light Source.
Sarah IrvineScience Division, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Diamond Light Source.
Andrew P FrenchSchool of Computer Science, University of Nottingham.
Alun W AshtonScience Division, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Diamond Light Source.
Elizabeth M H DukeScience Division, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Diamond Light Source.

Funding

3 D ELECTRON MICROSCOPY OF MACROMOLECULES (5P41RR002250-27)P41GM103832 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CHIU, WAH · 2012 to 2019
$15.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103832
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Segmentation is the process of isolating specific regions or objects within an imaged volume, so that further study can be undertaken on these areas of interest. When considering the analysis of complex biological systems, the segmentation of three-dimensional image data is a time consuming and labor intensive step. With the increased availability of many imaging modalities and with automated data collection schemes, this poses an increased challenge for the modern experimental biologist to move from data to knowledge. This publication describes the use of SuRVoS Workbench, a program designed to address these issues by providing methods to semi-automatically segment complex biological volumetric data. Three datasets of differing magnification and imaging modalities are presented here, each highlighting different strategies of segmenting with SuRVoS. Phase contrast X-ray tomography (microCT) of the fruiting body of a plant is used to demonstrate segmentation using model training, cryo electron tomography (cryoET) of human platelets is used to demonstrate segmentation using super- and megavoxels, and cryo soft X-ray tomography (cryoSXT) of a mammalian cell line is used to demonstrate the label splitting tools. Strategies and parameters for each datatype are also presented. By blending a selection of semi-automatic processes into a single interactive tool, SuRVoS provides several benefits. Overall time to segment volumetric data is reduced by a factor of five when compared to manual segmentation, a mainstay in many image processing fields. This is a significant savings when full manual segmentation can take weeks of effort. Additionally, subjectivity is addressed through the use of computationally identified boundaries, and splitting complex collections of objects by their calculated properties rather than on a case-by-case basis.

Indexed as

HumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID28872144
PMCPMC5614362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.