Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28872130›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2017

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research.

Christopher Weidner, Matthias Steinfath, Elisa Wistorf, Michael Oelgeschläger, Marlon R Schneider, Gilbert Schönfelder

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christopher WeidnerDepartment of Experimental Toxicology and ZEBET, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR).
Matthias SteinfathDepartment of Experimental Toxicology and ZEBET, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR).
Elisa WistorfDepartment of Experimental Toxicology and ZEBET, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR).
Michael OelgeschlägerDepartment of Experimental Toxicology and ZEBET, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR).
Marlon R SchneiderDepartment of Experimental Toxicology and ZEBET, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR).
Gilbert SchönfelderDepartment of Experimental Toxicology and ZEBET, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR); Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin; gilbert.schoenfelder@bfr.bund.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies that compared transcriptomic datasets of human diseases with datasets from mouse models using traditional gene-to-gene comparison techniques resulted in contradictory conclusions regarding the relevance of animal models for translational research. A major reason for the discrepancies between different gene expression analyses is the arbitrary filtering of differentially expressed genes. Furthermore, the comparison of single genes between different species and platforms often is limited by technical variance, leading to misinterpretation of the con/discordance between data from human and animal models. Thus, standardized approaches for systematic data analysis are needed. To overcome subjective gene filtering and ineffective gene-to-gene comparisons, we recently demonstrated that gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) has the potential to avoid these problems. Therefore, we developed a standardized protocol for the use of GSEA to distinguish between appropriate and inappropriate animal models for translational research. This protocol is not suitable to predict how to design new model systems a-priori, as it requires existing experimental omics data. However, the protocol describes how to interpret existing data in a standardized manner in order to select the most suitable animal model, thus avoiding unnecessary animal experiments and misleading translational studies.

Indexed as

AnimalsDisease Models, AnimalGene Expression ProfilingHumansMiceTranslational Research, Biomedical

Identifiers

PMID28872130
PMCPMC5614334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.