Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28871853›Full record

ArticleGlobal health action2017

Effect of a participatory multisectoral maternal and newborn intervention on maternal health service utilization and newborn care practices: a quasi-experimental study in three rural Ugandan districts.

Elizabeth Ekirapa-Kiracho, Rornald Muhumuza Kananura, Moses Tetui, Gertrude Namazzi, Aloysius Mutebi, Asha George, Ligia Paina, Peter Waiswa, Ahmed Bumba, Godfrey Mulekwa and 11 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readClinical Study
In one paragraph

Article in Global health action, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 32 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Elizabeth Ekirapa-Kirachoa Department of Health Policy Planning and Management , Makerere University School of Public Health , Kampala , Uganda.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6938-2068
Rornald Muhumuza Kananuraa Department of Health Policy Planning and Management , Makerere University School of Public Health , Kampala , Uganda.
Moses Tetuia Department of Health Policy Planning and Management , Makerere University School of Public Health , Kampala , Uganda.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6833-7601
Gertrude Namazzia Department of Health Policy Planning and Management , Makerere University School of Public Health , Kampala , Uganda.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1239-8311
Aloysius Mutebia Department of Health Policy Planning and Management , Makerere University School of Public Health , Kampala , Uganda.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6837-5488
Asha Georgec Department of International Health , Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore , MD , USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1018-2499
Ligia Painac Department of International Health , Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore , MD , USA.
Peter Waiswaa Department of Health Policy Planning and Management , Makerere University School of Public Health , Kampala , Uganda.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9868-0515
Ahmed Bumbag Kibuku District Health Office , Kibuku , Uganda.
Godfrey Mulekwah Pallisa District Health Office , Pallisa , Uganda.
Dinah Nakiganda-Busikui Kamuli District Health Office , Kamuli , Uganda.
Moses Lyagobai Kamuli District Health Office , Kamuli , Uganda.
Harriet Naigai Kamuli District Health Office , Kamuli , Uganda.
Mary Putanh Pallisa District Health Office , Pallisa , Uganda.
Agatha Kulwenzag Kibuku District Health Office , Kibuku , Uganda.
Judith Ajeanij Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology , Makerere University Medical School , Kampala , Uganda.
Ayub Kakaire-Kirundaa Department of Health Policy Planning and Management , Makerere University School of Public Health , Kampala , Uganda.
Fred Makumbik Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics , Makerere University School of Public Health , Kampala , Uganda.
Lynn Atuyambel Department of Community Health and Behavioural Sciences , Makerere University School of Public Health , Kampala , Uganda.
Olico Okuia Department of Health Policy Planning and Management , Makerere University School of Public Health , Kampala , Uganda.
Suzanne Namusoke Kiwanukaa Department of Health Policy Planning and Management , Makerere University School of Public Health , Kampala , Uganda.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4729-4897

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe MANIFEST study in eastern Uganda employed a participatory multisectoral approach to reduce barriers to access to maternal and newborn care services.

objectivesThis study analyses the effect of the intervention on the utilization of maternal and newborn services and care practices.

methodsThe quasi-experimental pre- and post-comparison design had two main components: community mobilization and empowerment, and health provider capacity building. The primary outcomes were utilization of antenatal care (ANC), delivery and postnatal care, and newborn care practices. Baseline (n = 2237) and endline (n = 1946) data were collected from women of reproductive age. The  data was analysed using difference in differences (DiD) analysis and  logistic regression.

resultsThe DiD results revealed an 8% difference in early ANC attendance (p < 0.01) and facility delivery (p < 0.01). Facility delivery increased from 66% to 73% in the intervention area, but remained unchanged in the comparison area (64% vs 63%, p < 0.01). The DiD results also demonstrated a 20% difference in clean cord care (p < 0.001) and an 8% difference in delayed bathing (p < 0.001). The intervention elements that predicted facility delivery were attending ANC four times [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17-1.74] and saving for maternal health (aOR 2.11, 95% CI 1.39-3.21). Facility delivery and village health team (VHT) home visits were key predictors for clean cord care and skin-to-skin care.

conclusionsThe multisectoral approach had positive effects on early ANC attendance, facility deliveries and newborn care practices. Community resources such as VHTs and savings are crucial to maternal and newborn outcomes and should be supported. VHT-led health education should incorporate practical measures that enable families to save and access transport services to enhance adequate preparation for birth.

Indexed as

Rural PopulationAdolescentAdultCapacity BuildingFemaleHealth EducationHouse CallsHumansInfant, NewbornMaternal HealthMaternal Health ServicesOdds RatioParturitionPower, PsychologicalPregnancyPrenatal Carecommunity health workersimplementation scienceMaternalnewbornparticipatory action research

Identifiers

PMID28871853
PMCPMC5645678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.