Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28871497›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2018

Safety and Efficacy of a New Swallowable Intragastric Balloon Not Needing Endoscopy: Early Italian Experience.

A Genco, I Ernesti, R Ienca, G Casella, S Mariani, D Francomano, E Soricelli, M Lorenzo, M Monti

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Endoscopic bariatrics: Current status and emerging technologies.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Overview on the endoscopic treatment for obesity: A review.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Progress in the study of intragastric occupancy device for weight reduction.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2023
    Article
  17. Endoscopic bariatrics: current therapies and future directions.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2022
    Review
  18. Six intragastric balloons: Which to choose?World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A GencoDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Surgical Endoscopy Unit, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy. alfredo.genco@uniroma1.it.ORCID 0000-0001-9702-8998
I ErnestiDepartment of Experimental Medicine-Medical Physiopathology, Food Science and Endocrinology Section, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
R IencaDepartment of Experimental Medicine-Medical Physiopathology, Food Science and Endocrinology Section, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
G CasellaDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Surgical Endoscopy Unit, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
S MarianiDepartment of Experimental Medicine-Medical Physiopathology, Food Science and Endocrinology Section, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
D FrancomanoDepartment of Experimental Medicine-Medical Physiopathology, Food Science and Endocrinology Section, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
E SoricelliDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Surgical Endoscopy Unit, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
M LorenzoNational Health Service, Naples, Italy.
M MontiDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Surgical Endoscopy Unit, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Sapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a new intragastric balloon (Elipse™ Balloon, Allurion Technologies, Natick, MA USA) not needing endoscopy. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe balloon was swallowed under fluoroscopy in 38 consecutive patients (F/M 28/10, mean age 46.4 ± 10.6 years, mean weight 109.7 ± 21.9 kg, and mean body mass index (BMI) 38.6 ± 6.7 kg/m

resultsThere were no complications during balloon passage. After 16 weeks, the mean weight loss was 12.7 kg, mean percent excess weight loss was 26%, and mean BMI reduction was 4.2 kg/m

conclusionsThe results of this study on 38 consecutive patients demonstrate that the Elipse™ Balloon is safe, effective, and very well accepted by patients.

Indexed as

Gastric BalloonGastroscopyAdministration, OralAdultBody Mass IndexComorbidityDeglutitionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedObesity, MorbidOverweightPilot ProjectsElipse™Intragastric balloonOverweight/obese treatmentWeight loss

Identifiers

PMID28871497
OpenAlexW2753156093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.