ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2019
International registry on the use of the CytoSorb® adsorber in ICU patients : Study protocol and preliminary results.
Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 7 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 50 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
International Registry on the Use of the CytoSorb®-Adsorber in ICU Patients
Development of a Web-based Multicenter Registry on the Use of oXiris Membrane for Extracorporeal Blood Purification Therapies in Critically Ill Patients
Use of EBPT in Critically Ill Patients With AKI and/or Multiorgan Failure: a Multicenter Prospective Observational Registry
Extracorporeal Blood Purification Therapy in Critically Ill Patients: an Interactive,Web-based,Multicenter,Observational Prospective Registry
Dosing of Extracorporeal Cytokine Removal In Septic Shock (DECRISS): a Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Clinical Trial
Innovative Solutions to Organ-substituting Technologies in the Treatment of Heart and Pulmonary Failure
Development of Innovative Technologies for the Treatment of Pulmonary and Heart Failure to Prolong Human's Life
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- CytoSorb in patients with coronavirus disease 2019: A rapid evidence review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Pooled it
- Mortality and adverse events of hemoadsorption with CytoSorb® in critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · 2022Pooled it
- Hemoperfusion and blood purification strategies in patients with COVID-19: A systematic review.Artificial organs · 2021Pooled it
- Trial
- The Effects of CytoSorb in Critically Ill Adult Patients on Vasopressor Support: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Use of Oxiris membrane in real-world clinical practice in critical care patients: a multicenter observational study.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2025Article
- Retrospective evaluation of efficacy of CytoSorbWorld journal of critical care medicine · 2025Article
- From critical care to organ preservation: the potential role of hemadsorption in transplantation-a narrative review.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2025Review
- Acute Kidney Injury, Renal Replacement Therapy, and Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Treatment During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Single-Center Experience.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Observational
- Article
- Navigating the Modern Landscape of Sepsis: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Adjunctive immunotherapeutic agents in patients with sepsis and septic shock: a multidisciplinary consensus of 23.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2024Article
- Survival benefit of resin cartridge extracorporeal blood purification therapy in patients with septic shock.Turkish journal of medical sciences · 2024Article
- Extracorporeal blood purification strategies in sepsis and septic shock: An insight into recent advancements.World journal of critical care medicine · 2023Review
- Rationale for sequential extracorporeal therapy (SET) in sepsis.Critical care (London, England) · 2023Review
- Effect of extracorporeal hemoadsorption in critically ill patients with COVID-19: A narrative review.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- Antithrombotic drug removal from whole blood using Haemoadsorption with a porous polymer bead sorbent.European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy · 2022Article
- Mitochondrial DNA as a Candidate Marker of Multiple Organ Failure after Cardiac Surgery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Immunomodulation by Hemoadsorption-Changes in Hepatic Biotransformation Capacity in Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Prospective Study.Biomedicines · 2022Article
- Cytokine Adsorption in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients, a Case-Control Study.Journal of intensive care medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe aim of this clinical registry is to record the use of CytoSorb® adsorber device in critically ill patients under real-life conditions.
methodsThe registry records all relevant information in the course of product use, e. g., diagnosis, comorbidities, course of the condition, treatment, concomitant medication, clinical laboratory parameters, and outcome (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02312024). Primary endpoint is in-hospital mortality as compared to the mortality predicted by the APACHE II and SAPS II score, respectively.
resultsAs of January 30, 2017, 130 centers from 22 countries were participating. Data available from the start of the registry on May 18, 2015 to November 24, 2016 (122 centers; 22 countries) were analyzed, of whom 20 centers from four countries provided data for a total of 198 patients (mean age 60.3 ± 15.1 years, 135 men [68.2%]). In all, 192 (97.0%) had 1 to 5 Cytosorb® adsorber applications. Sepsis was the most common indication for CytoSorb® treatment (135 patients). Mean APACHE II score in this group was 33.1 ± 8.4 [range 15-52] with a predicted risk of death of 78%, whereas the observed mortality was 65%. There were no significant decreases in the SOFA scores after treatment (17.2 ± 4.8 [3-24]). However interleukin-6 levels were markedly reduced after treatment (median 5000 pg/ml before and 289 pg/ml after treatment, respectively).
conclusionsThis third interim report demonstrates the feasibility of the registry with excellent data quality and completeness from 20 study centers. The results must be interpreted with caution, since the numbers are still small; however the disease severity is remarkably high and suggests that adsorber treatment might be used as an ultimate treatment in life-threatening situations. There were no device-associated side effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28871441What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.