Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28871435›Full record

ArticleAMB Express2017

Comparison of the bacterial community composition in the granular and the suspended phase of sequencing batch reactors.

Enikö Szabó, Raquel Liébana, Malte Hermansson, Oskar Modin, Frank Persson, Britt-Marie Wilén

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMB Express, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Mechanisms of microbial co-aggregation in mixed anaerobic cultures.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Compounds affecting predation by and viability of predatory bacteria.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Enikö SzabóDivision of Water Environment Technology, Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, 41296, Gothenburg, Sweden. eniko.szabo@chalmers.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1586-5205
Raquel LiébanaDivision of Water Environment Technology, Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, 41296, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Malte HermanssonDepartment of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg, 40530, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Oskar ModinDivision of Water Environment Technology, Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, 41296, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Frank PerssonDivision of Water Environment Technology, Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, 41296, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Britt-Marie WilénDivision of Water Environment Technology, Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, 41296, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Chalmers University of Technology · SEUniversity of Gothenburg · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Granulation of activated sludge is an increasingly important area within the field of wastewater treatment. Granulation is usually achieved by high hydraulic selection pressure, which results in the wash-out of slow settling particles. The effect of the harsh wash-out conditions on the granular sludge ecosystem is not yet fully understood, but different bacterial groups may be affected to varying degrees. In this study, we used high-throughput amplicon sequencing to follow the community composition in granular sludge reactors for 12 weeks, both in the granular phase and the suspended phase (effluent). The microbiome of the washed out biomass was similar but not identical to the microbiome of the granular biomass. Certain taxa (e.g. Flavobacterium spp. and Bdellovibrio spp.) had significantly (p < 0.05) higher relative abundance in the granules compared to the effluent. Fluorescence in situ hybridization images indicated that these taxa were mainly located in the interior of granules and therefore protected from erosion. Other taxa (e.g. Meganema sp. and Zooglea sp.) had significantly lower relative abundance in the granules compared to the effluent, and appeared to be mainly located on the surface of granules and therefore subject to erosion. Despite being washed out, these taxa were among the most abundant members of the granular sludge communities and were likely growing fast in the reactors. The ratio between relative abundance in the granular biomass and in the effluent did not predict temporal variation of the taxa in the reactors, but it did appear to predict the spatial location of the taxa in the granules.

Indexed as

Aerobic granular sludgeMicrobial community compositionSequencing batch reactorsSpatial distributionTemporal variationWash-out dynamics

Identifiers

PMID28871435
PMCPMC5583138
OpenAlexW2751697887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.