Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28871376›Full record

ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2017

[Branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm - contra resection].

M Brunner, G F Weber, S Kersting, Robert Grützmann

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Pancreatic cystic neoplasms].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M BrunnerKlink für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum der Friedrich-Alexander-Universität, Krankenhausstraße 12, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland.
G F WeberKlink für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum der Friedrich-Alexander-Universität, Krankenhausstraße 12, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland.
S KerstingKlink für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum der Friedrich-Alexander-Universität, Krankenhausstraße 12, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland.
Robert GrützmannKlink für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum der Friedrich-Alexander-Universität, Krankenhausstraße 12, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland. Robert.Gruetzmann@uk-erlangen.de.
Universitätsklinikum Erlangen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to improvements in imaging modalities the diagnosis of branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (BD-IPMN) has been significantly increased in recent years. A BD-IPMN is frequently diagnosed as an incidental finding in asymptomatic patients. The optimal management of BD-IPMN is the subject of controversial discussions. Numerous studies have shown that an individualized therapeutic strategy with a follow-up observation of most BD-IPMNs is feasible and safe, considering age, comorbidities and patient preference. An accurate evaluation of BD-IPMN with a detailed anamnesis, high-resolution imaging techniques and endoscopic ultrasound is necessary. Symptomatic patients as well as patients with so-called high-risk stigmata should undergo resection. Asymptomatic patients with so-called worrisome features can either undergo surveillance or surgical resection, taking age and comorbidities into account. For BD-IPMN patients without high-risk stigmata and worrisome features and showing no symptoms, surveillance of the pancreatic lesion is the preferred approach. The high prevalence of BD-IPMN, limitations in differential diagnostics, an overestimation of the risk of malignancy due to an overrepresentation of symptomatic and suspected BD-IPMN in resected cohorts, an overestimated role of BD-IPMN as precursor lesions for pancreatic carcinoma and evidence of the safety of follow-up surveillance, underline the enormous importance of surveillance. Based on this and considering the background of a notable mortality and morbidity of pancreatic surgery, aggressive management with prophylactic surgical resection is not justified for all BD-IPMN, in particular for low-risk lesions.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma, MucinousAdenocarcinoma, PapillaryAgedCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalCholangiopancreatography, Magnetic ResonanceContraindicationsDiagnosis, DifferentialGuideline AdherenceHumansIncidental FindingsMagnetic Resonance ImagingPancreatic NeoplasmsPrevalencePrognosisRisk FactorsSensitivity and SpecificityMalignancy riskPancreatic cystsPancreatic surgeryPrevalenceSurveillance

Identifiers

PMID28871376
OpenAlexW2753926191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.