Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28871171›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Chemotherapy-Response Monitoring of Breast Cancer Patients Using Quantitative Ultrasound-Based Intra-Tumour Heterogeneities.

Ali Sadeghi-Naini, Lakshmanan Sannachi, Hadi Tadayyon, William T Tran, Elzbieta Slodkowska, Maureen Trudeau, Sonal Gandhi, Kathleen Pritchard, Michael C Kolios, Gregory J Czarnota

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. H-Scan Ultrasound Monitoring of Breast Cancer Response to Chemotherapy and Validation With Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Breast Tumor Classification Using Intratumoral Quantitative Ultrasound Descriptors.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ali Sadeghi-NainiDepartment of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5055-339X
Lakshmanan SannachiDepartment of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Hadi TadayyonDepartment of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
William T TranDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Elzbieta SlodkowskaDivision of Anatomic Pathology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Maureen TrudeauDivision of Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Sonal GandhiDivision of Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Kathleen PritchardDivision of Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Michael C KoliosDepartment of Physics, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9994-8293
Gregory J CzarnotaDepartment of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. Gregory.Czarnota@sunnybrook.ca.

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anti-cancer therapies including chemotherapy aim to induce tumour cell death. Cell death introduces alterations in cell morphology and tissue micro-structures that cause measurable changes in tissue echogenicity. This study investigated the effectiveness of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) parametric imaging to characterize intra-tumour heterogeneity and monitor the pathological response of breast cancer to chemotherapy in a large cohort of patients (n = 100). Results demonstrated that QUS imaging can non-invasively monitor pathological response and outcome of breast cancer patients to chemotherapy early following treatment initiation. Specifically, QUS biomarkers quantifying spatial heterogeneities in size, concentration and spacing of acoustic scatterers could predict treatment responses of patients with cross-validated accuracies of 82 ± 0.7%, 86 ± 0.7% and 85 ± 0.9% and areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.75 ± 0.1, 0.80 ± 0.1 and 0.89 ± 0.1 at 1, 4 and 8 weeks after the start of treatment, respectively. The patients classified as responders and non-responders using QUS biomarkers demonstrated significantly different survivals, in good agreement with clinical and pathological endpoints. The results form a basis for using early predictive information on survival-linked patient response to facilitate adapting standard anti-cancer treatments on an individual patient basis.

Indexed as

Biological Variation, PopulationUltrasonographyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorBiopsyBreast NeoplasmsCanadaChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImmunohistochemistryKaplan-Meier EstimateMiddle AgedBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID28871171
PMCPMC5583340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.