ArticleScientific reports2017
Hub-driven remote synchronization in brain networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Response inhibition in premotor cortex corresponds to a complex reshuffle of the mesoscopic information network.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Explosive Synchronization-Based Brain Modulation Reduces Hypersensitivity in the Brain Network: A Computational Model Study.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2022Article
- Identification ofCell journal · 2021Article
- Multistability in a star network of Kuramoto-type oscillators with synaptic plasticity.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Inter-Brain Synchronization During Sandplay Therapy: Individual Analyses.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Phase and amplitude dynamics of coupled oscillator systems on complex networks.Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.) · 2020Article
- Small-worldness favours network inference in synthetic neural networks.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- The Statistical Analysis of Top Hubs in Growing Geographical Networks with Optimal Policy.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- The Neural Correlates of Consciousness and Attention: Two Sister Processes of the Brain.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019Review
- Connection strength of the macaque connectome augments topological and functional network attributes.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2019Article
- Relay synchronization in multiplex networks.Scientific reports · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The phenomenon of "remote synchronization" (RS), first observed in a star network of oscillators, involves synchronization of unconnected peripheral nodes through a hub that maintains independent dynamics. In the RS regime the central hub was thought to serve as a passive gate for information transfer between nodes. Here, we investigate the physical origin of this phenomenon. Surprisingly, we find that a hub node can drive remote synchronization of peripheral oscillators even in the presence of a repulsive mean field, thus actively governing network dynamics while remaining asynchronous. We study this novel phenomenon in complex networks endowed with multiple hub-nodes, a ubiquitous feature of many real-world systems, including brain connectivity networks. We show that a change in the natural frequency of a single hub can alone reshape synchronization patterns across the entire network, and switch from direct to remote synchronization, or to hub-driven desynchronization. Hub-driven RS may provide a mechanism to account for the role of structural hubs in the organization of brain functional connectivity networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.