Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28871144›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Evolutionary morphology of the lizard chemosensory system.

Simon Baeckens, Anthony Herrel, Chris Broeckhoven, Menelia Vasilopoulou-Kampitsi, Katleen Huyghe, Jana Goyens, Raoul Van Damme

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Tongue of the Egyptian Endemic Bridled Skink (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  9. Protein-lipid Association in Lizard Chemical Signals.Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Simon BaeckensLaboratory of Functional Morphology, Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Wilrijk, Belgium. simon.baeckens@uantwerp.be.ORCID 0000-0003-2189-9548
Anthony HerrelUMR7179, CNRS/MNHN, 75005, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0991-4434
Chris BroeckhovenDepartment of Botany & Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland, 7602, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Menelia Vasilopoulou-KampitsiLaboratory of Functional Morphology, Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Katleen HuygheLaboratory of Functional Morphology, Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Jana GoyensLaboratory of Functional Morphology, Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Raoul Van DammeLaboratory of Functional Morphology, Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Wilrijk, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Foraging mode plays a pivotal role in traditional reconstructions of squamate evolution. Transitions between modes are said to spark concerted changes in the morphology, physiology, behaviour, and life history of lizards. With respect to their sensory systems, species that adopt a sit-and-wait strategy are thought to rely on visual cues primarily, while actively hunting species would predominantly use chemical information. The morphology of the tongue and the vomeronasal-organs is believed to mirror this dichotomy. Still, support for this idea of concerted evolution of the morphology of the lizard sensory system merely originates from studies comparing only a few, distantly related taxa that differ in many aspects of their biology besides foraging mode. Hence, we compared vomeronasal-lingual morphology among closely related lizard species (Lacertidae). Our findings show considerable interspecific variation indicating that the chemosensory system of lacertids has undergone substantial change over a short evolutionary time. Although our results imply independent evolution of tongue and vomeronasal-organ form, we find evidence for co-variation between sampler and sensor, hinting towards an 'optimization' for efficient chemoreception. Furthermore, our findings suggest species' degree of investment in chemical signalling, and not foraging behaviour, as a leading factor driving the diversity in vomeronasal-lingual morphology among lacertid species.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAnimalsLizardsTongueVomeronasal Organ

Identifiers

PMID28871144
PMCPMC5583331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.