Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28871033›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2017

Reticulospinal Contributions to Gross Hand Function after Human Spinal Cord Injury.

Stuart N Baker, Monica A Perez

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 95 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed, 153 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Tracking the corticospinal responses to strength training.European journal of applied physiology · 2020
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Descending Brainstem Systems Contribute to Ankle Clonus in Humans with Spinal Cord Injury.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. What Is the StartReact Effect?Acta physiologica (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Review
  11. Enhanced Reticulospinal Output in Subacute Spinal Cord Injury Patients with Spasticity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Recovery of Dexterous Motor Control via Non-Monosynaptic Corticospinal Pathways.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Medullary and C3-C4 propriospinal pathways underlying mammalian forelimb movement control.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Stuart N BakerInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Henry Wellcome Building, Medical School, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, United Kingdom perezmo@miami.edu stuart.baker@newcastle.ac.uk.
Monica A PerezDepartment of Neurological Surgery, The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami, Miami, Florida 33136, Bruce W. Carter Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Miami, Florida 33125, and perezmo@miami.edu stuart.baker@newcastle.ac.uk.
Newcastle University · GBUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

Corticospinal Function after Spinal Cord InjuryR01NS090622 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI PEREZ, MONICA A · 2014 to 2018
$1.6M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS090622
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple descending motor pathways likely contribute to the recovery of hand motor function following spinal cord injury (SCI). Reticulospinal neurons project to spinal motor neurons controlling hand muscles and extensively sprout into gray matter structures after SCI; therefore, it has been proposed that the reticulospinal tract is one of the descending motor pathways involved in recovery of hand function after injury. To test this hypothesis, we examined the StartReact response, an involuntary release of a planned movement via a startling stimulus that engages the reticulospinal tract, by measuring reaction times from electromyographic activity in an intrinsic finger muscle during three motor tasks requiring different degrees of hand dexterity: index finger abduction, a precision grip, and a power grip. Males and females with and without incomplete chronic cervical SCI were tested. We found that although SCI participants voluntarily responded to all tasks, reaction times were shorter during a startle cue while performing a power grip but not index finger abduction or precision grip. Control subjects had similarly shorter reaction times during a startle cue in all motor tasks. These results provide the first evidence for a contribution of the reticulospinal tract to hand control in humans with SCI during gross finger manipulations and suggest that this contribution is less pronounced during fine dexterous finger movements.

Indexed as

AdultCervical VertebraeElectromyographyEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleHandHand StrengthHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhotic StimulationPyramidal TractsRandom AllocationReaction TimeSpinal Cord Injuriescorticospinal tractgraspinghand controlprimary motor cortextetraplegiavoluntary drive

Identifiers

PMID28871033
PMCPMC5628413
OpenAlexW2752777408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.