Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28870997›Full record

ReviewCancer genomics & proteomics

The Evolution, Functions and Applications of the Breast Cancer Genes

Claire M Pfeffer, Benjamin N Ho, Amareshwar T K Singh

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer genomics & proteomics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Assessing the Clinical Relevance ofCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026
    Article
  2. The Elephant and the Spandrel.Evolution, medicine, and public health · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Onco-Breastomics: An Eco-Evo-Devo Holistic Approach.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. A global perspective on the ethnic-specificJournal of the National Cancer Center · 2023
    Review
  8. Essential role of theBiotechnologia · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. HumanLife science alliance · 2022
    Article
  11. Homologous Recombination Deficiencies and Hereditary Tumors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  12. Single-Strand Annealing in Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. A Phylogenetic Approach to Analyze the Conservativeness of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. TheGenes · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Claire M PfefferDepartment of Biology, Division of Natural and Social Sciences, Carthage College, Kenosha, WI, U.S.A.
Benjamin N HoDepartment of Biology, Division of Natural and Social Sciences, Carthage College, Kenosha, WI, U.S.A.
Amareshwar T K SinghDepartment of Biology, Division of Natural and Social Sciences, Carthage College, Kenosha, WI, U.S.A. asingh1@carthage.edu.
Carthage College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BRCA1 and BRCA2 are both tumor suppressors whose mutations are the cause of most hereditary breast cancers. Both genes are highly involved in ensuring genome stability. BRCA1 homologs are found in the plant and animal kingdoms while BRCA2 homologs are additionally found in the fungi kingdom. The initial origin of both genes remains unknown, however it is expected that the common ancestors originated around 1.6 billion years ago prior to the kingdoms diverging. There has been a great amount of divergence between homologs that is not observed in other tumor suppressors with only functionally important domains conserved. This divergence continues today with evidence of primate BRCA1/2 evolution. Cancer-associated mutations have been found to occur at conserved sites, indicating that conserved sites are important for function. In this study, we present a review on the phylogenesis of BRCA1 and BRCA2.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansPhylogenyProtein DomainsBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinBRCA1BRCA2breast cancerphylogenesisreview

Identifiers

PMID28870997
PMCPMC5611516
OpenAlexW2752646318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.