Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28870257›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2017

Enrichment of beneficial bacteria in the skin microbiota of bats persisting with white-nose syndrome.

Virginie Lemieux-Labonté, Anouk Simard, Craig K R Willis, François-Joseph Lapointe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Interactions at theMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Role of anti-Applied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Variation and assembly mechanisms ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  8. A Palearctic view of a bat fungal disease.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Microbiota diversity and anti-Applied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Virginie Lemieux-LabontéDépartement de Sciences Biologiques, Université de Montréal, CP 6182, Succursale Centre-ville, Montréal, Québec, H2V 2S9, Canada. virginie.lemieux-labonte@umontreal.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-9964-4495
Anouk SimardDirection de l'expertise sur la faune terrestre, l'herpétofaune et l'avifaune, Ministère des Forêts, de la Faune et des Parcs, Québec, Canada.
Craig K R WillisDepartment of Biology and Centre for Forest Interdisciplinary Research, University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
François-Joseph LapointeDépartement de Sciences Biologiques, Université de Montréal, CP 6182, Succursale Centre-ville, Montréal, Québec, H2V 2S9, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfectious diseases of wildlife are increasing worldwide with implications for conservation and human public health. The microbiota (i.e. microbial community living on or in a host) could influence wildlife disease resistance or tolerance. White-nose syndrome (WNS), caused by the fungus Pseudogymnoascus destructans (Pd), has killed millions of hibernating North American bats since 2007. We characterized the skin microbiota of naïve, pre-WNS little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus) from three WNS-negative hibernation sites and persisting, previously exposed bats from three WNS-positive sites to test the hypothesis that the skin microbiota of bats shifts following WNS invasion.

resultsUsing high-throughput 16S rRNA gene sequencing on 66 bats and 11 environmental samples, we found that hibernation site strongly influenced the composition and diversity of the skin microbiota. Bats from WNS-positive and WNS-negative sites differed in alpha and beta diversity, as well as in microbiota composition. Alpha diversity was reduced in persisting, WNS-positive bats, and the microbiota profile was enriched with particular taxa such Janthinobacterium, Micrococcaceae, Pseudomonas, Ralstonia, and Rhodococcus. Some of these taxa are recognized for their antifungal activity, and specific strains of Rhodococcus and Pseudomonas are known to inhibit Pd growth. Composition of the microbial community in the hibernaculum environment and the community on bat skin was superficially similar but differed in relative abundance of some bacterial taxa.

conclusionsOur results are consistent with the hypothesis that Pd invasion leads to a shift in the skin microbiota of surviving bats and suggest the possibility that the microbiota plays a protective role for bats facing WNS. The detection of what appears to be enrichment of beneficial bacteria in the skin microbiota of persisting bats is a promising discovery for species re-establishment. Our findings highlight not only the potential value of management actions that might encourage transmission, growth, and establishment of beneficial bacteria on bats, and within hibernacula, but also the potential risks of such management actions.

Indexed as

AscomycotaAnimalsAnimals, WildBacteriaChiropteraGenes, rRNAHibernationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMicrobiotaMicrococcaceaeMycosesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSkinRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNAConservation and managementEndangered speciesMyotis lucifugusSkin microbiotaWhite-nose syndrome

Identifiers

PMID28870257
PMCPMC5584028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.