Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28870234›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2017

Collection of non-meconium stool on fecal occult blood cards is an effective method for fecal microbiota studies in infants.

Wendy S W Wong, Nicole Clemency, Elisabeth Klein, Marina Provenzano, Ramaswamy Iyer, John E Niederhuber, Suchitra K Hourigan

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Nutrients · 2021
    Article
  6. Microbiome Analysis of More Than 2,000 NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme Samples Shows the Potential to Improve Screening Accuracy.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Comparison of Fecal Collection Methods for Microbiome and Metabolomics Studies.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wendy S W WongInova Translational Medicine Institute (ITMI), 3300 Gallows Road, Claude Moore Bldg, 2nd Floor, Falls Church, VA, 22042, USA.
Nicole ClemencyInova Translational Medicine Institute (ITMI), 3300 Gallows Road, Claude Moore Bldg, 2nd Floor, Falls Church, VA, 22042, USA.
Elisabeth KleinInova Translational Medicine Institute (ITMI), 3300 Gallows Road, Claude Moore Bldg, 2nd Floor, Falls Church, VA, 22042, USA.
Marina ProvenzanoInova Translational Medicine Institute (ITMI), 3300 Gallows Road, Claude Moore Bldg, 2nd Floor, Falls Church, VA, 22042, USA.
Ramaswamy IyerInova Translational Medicine Institute (ITMI), 3300 Gallows Road, Claude Moore Bldg, 2nd Floor, Falls Church, VA, 22042, USA.
John E NiederhuberInova Translational Medicine Institute (ITMI), 3300 Gallows Road, Claude Moore Bldg, 2nd Floor, Falls Church, VA, 22042, USA.
Suchitra K HouriganInova Translational Medicine Institute (ITMI), 3300 Gallows Road, Claude Moore Bldg, 2nd Floor, Falls Church, VA, 22042, USA. suchihourigan@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2656-5694
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective methods are needed to collect fecal samples from children for large-scale microbiota studies. Stool collected on fecal occult blood test (FOBT) cards that can be mailed provides an effective solution; however, the quality of sequencing resulting from this method is unknown. The aim of this study is to compare microbiota metrics of 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene sequencing from stool and meconium collected on FOBT cards with stool collected in an Eppendorf tube (ET) under different conditions.

methodsEight stool samples from children in diapers aged 0 month-2 years and three meconium samples were collected and stored as follows: (1) ≤ 2 days at room temperature (RT) in an ET, (2) 7 days at - 80 °C in an ET, (3) 3-5 days at RT on a FOBT card, (4) 7 days at RT on a FOBT card, and (5) 7 days at - 80 °C on a FOBT card. Samples stored at - 80 °C were frozen immediately. Each specimen/condition underwent 16S rRNA gene sequencing with replicates on the Illumina MiSeq. Alpha and beta diversity measures and relative abundance of major phyla were compared between storage conditions and container (ET vs. FOBT card), with pairwise comparison between different storage conditions and the "standard" of 7 days at - 80 °C in an ET and fresh stool in an ET.

resultsStool samples clustered mainly by individual diaper (P < 10

conclusionsAcknowledging certain limitations, FOBT cards may be a useful tool in large-scale stool microbiota studies in children requiring outpatient follow-up where only small amounts of stool can be obtained, but should not be used when studying meconium.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeChild, PreschoolFecesFreezingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMeconiumOccult BloodRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSpecimen HandlingTemperatureRNA, Ribosomal, 16SChildrenFecal occult blood cardMeconiumMicrobiotaStoolStorage

Identifiers

PMID28870234
PMCPMC5583988
OpenAlexW2750632323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.