ArticleGlobalization and health2017
Implementation framework for chronic disease intervention effectiveness in Māori and other indigenous communities.
Article in Globalization and health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
66 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A rapid review to inform the policy and practice for the implementation of chronic disease prevention and management programs for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in primary care.Health research policy and systems · 2024Pooled it
- Conducting co-creation for public health in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review and key informant perspectives on implementation barriers and facilitators.Globalization and health · 2024Pooled it
- Frameworks for implementation of policies promoting healthy nutrition and physically active lifestyle: systematic review.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2022Pooled it
- Implementation effectiveness of health interventions for indigenous communities: a systematic review.Implementation science : IS · 2019Pooled it
- Efficacy of an incentive intervention on secondary prophylaxis for young people with rheumatic fever: a multiple baseline study.BMC public health · 2019Trial
- How power is conceptualized and operationalized in evidence-based intervention implementation: a scoping review.Implementation science : IS · 2026Article
- Decolonising global health through implementation science: defining the path to equity and structural transformation.BMJ open · 2026Review
- Methods to design, adapt and apply equity-focused implementation science theories, models and frameworks in healthcare systems: a scoping review.Implementation science communications · 2026Review
- Implementing HPV self-collection: a scoping review of facilitators and strategies among Indigenous women and people with a cervix.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Towards a decolonising implementation science: principles from Indigenous leadership.The Lancet. Global health · 2026Review
- Cultural adaptations made to existing implementation science theories, models, frameworks, or outcomes: a scoping review.Translational behavioral medicine · 2026Article
- Applications of social marketing for implementation science: a scoping review.Implementation science : IS · 2025Article
- Effect of restricted retail merchandising of discretionary food and beverages on population diet: post-trial follow-up of a pragmatic randomised controlled trial.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2025Article
- Adaptations to implementation frameworks for minority ethnic groups to improve health equity: systematic scoping review.BJPsych open · 2025Review
- Conducting an implementation intervention study with American Indian and Alaska Native communities: Methodological considerations.Contemporary clinical trials · 2025Article
- Transformative community-engaged science: Strengthening relationships between science and society.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Authentic co-design: an essential prerequisite to health equity in Aotearoa New Zealand.Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand · 2025Article
- How to leverage implementation research for equity in global health.Global health research and policy · 2024Article
- Modifications of the readiness assessment for pragmatic trials tool for appropriate use with Indigenous populations.BMC medical research methodology · 2024Article
- Cultural and co-designed principles for developing a Māori kaumātua housing village to address health and social wellbeing.BMC public health · 2024Article
6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAbout 40% of all health burden in New Zealand is due to cancer, cardiovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes/obesity. Outcomes for Māori (indigenous people) are significantly worse than non-Maori; these inequities mirror those found in indigenous communities elsewhere. Evidence-based interventions with established efficacy may not be effective in indigenous communities without addressing specific implementation challenges. We present an implementation framework for interventions to prevent and treat chronic conditions for Māori and other indigenous communities. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK: The He Pikinga Waiora Implementation Framework has indigenous self-determination at its core and consists of four elements: cultural-centeredness, community engagement, systems thinking, and integrated knowledge translation. All elements have conceptual fit with Kaupapa Māori aspirations (i.e., indigenous knowledge creation, theorizing, and methodology) and all have demonstrated evidence of positive implementation outcomes. APPLYING THE FRAMEWORK: A coding scheme derived from the Framework was applied to 13 studies of diabetes prevention in indigenous communities in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States from a systematic review. Cross-tabulations demonstrated that culture-centeredness (p = .008) and community engagement (p = .009) explained differences in diabetes outcomes and community engagement (p = .098) explained difference in blood pressure outcomes. IMPLICATIONS AND
conclusionsThe He Pikinga Waiora Implementation Framework appears to be well suited to advance implementation science for indigenous communities in general and Māori in particular. The framework has promise as a policy and planning tool to evaluate and design effective interventions for chronic disease prevention in indigenous communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.