Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28870194›Full record

Trial reportBMC complementary and alternative medicine2017

A yeast fermentate improves gastrointestinal discomfort and constipation by modulation of the gut microbiome: results from a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled pilot trial.

Iris Pinheiro, Larry Robinson, An Verhelst, Massimo Marzorati, Björn Winkens, Pieter Van den Abbeele, Sam Possemiers

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC complementary and alternative medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03051399 (Clinical Evaluation of the Effects of EpiCor Brand Yeast Fermentate), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03051399 nacompletednot on this map

Clinical Evaluation of the Effects of EpiCor Brand Yeast Fermentate (Made Using Saccharomyces Cerevisiae) on Digestive Comfort, Intestinal Barrier Function and Prebiotic Modulation of the Gut Microbiota.

TypeinterventionalSponsorProDigestRan2015 to 2016Enrolled80ConditionsConstipation, Gastrointestinal DiscomfortArmsPlacebo, EpiCor
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. AGut microbiome (Cambridge, England) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. AAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Iris PinheiroProDigest, Technologiepark 3, 9052, Ghent, Belgium.
Larry RobinsonEmbria Health Sciences, 2105 SE Creekview Dr, Ankeny, IA, 50021, USA.
An VerhelstProDigest, Technologiepark 3, 9052, Ghent, Belgium.
Massimo MarzoratiCenter of Microbial Ecology and Technology (CMET), University of Ghent, Coupure Links 653, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Björn WinkensDepartment of Methodology and Statistics, Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, 6200 MD, The Netherlands.
Pieter Van den AbbeeleProDigest, Technologiepark 3, 9052, Ghent, Belgium.
Sam PossemiersProDigest, Technologiepark 3, 9052, Ghent, Belgium. Sam.Possemiers@prodigest.eu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6893-5780
ProDigest (Belgium) · BEGhent University · BEMaastricht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConstipation and symptoms of gastrointestinal discomfort such as bloating are common among otherwise healthy individuals, but with significant impact on quality of life. Despite the recognized contribution of the gut microbiome to this pathology, little is known about which group(s) of microorganism(s) are playing a role. A previous study performed in vitro suggests that EpiCor® fermentate has prebiotic-like properties, being able to favorably modulate the composition of the gut microbiome. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effects of EpiCor fermentate in a population with symptoms of gastrointestinal discomfort and reduced bowel movements and to evaluate its effect at the level of the gut microbiome.

methodsThis pilot study was performed according to a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel design. Eighty subjects with symptoms of gastrointestinal discomfort and constipation were allocated to one of two trial arms (placebo or EpiCor fermentate). Randomization was done in a stratified manner according to symptom severity, resulting in two subgroups of patients: severe and moderate. Daily records of gastrointestinal symptoms were assessed on a 5-point scale, and also stool frequency and consistency were documented during a 2-week run-in and a 6-week intervention phases. Averages over two-week intervals were calculated. Constipation-associated quality of life and general perceived stress were assessed at baseline and after 3 and 6 weeks of intervention. Fecal samples were also collected at these same time points.

resultsEpiCor fermentate led to a significant improvement of symptoms such as bloating/distension (p = 0.033 and p = 0.024 after 2 and 4 weeks of intervention, respectively), feeling of fullness (p = 0.004 and p = 0.023 after 2 and 4 weeks of intervention, respectively) and general daily scores (p = 0.046 after 2 weeks of intervention) in the moderate subgroup. A significant improvement in stool consistency was observed for the total population (p = 0.023 after 2 weeks of intervention) as well as for the severe subgroup (p = 0.046 after 2 weeks of intervention), and a nearly significant increase in stool frequency was detected for the total cohort (p = 0.083 and p = 0.090 after 2 and 4 weeks of intervention, respectively). These effects were accompanied by an improvement in constipation-associated quality of life and general perceived stress, particularly in the moderate subgroup. Members of the families Bacteroidaceae and Prevotellaceae, two groups of bacteria that have been previously reported to be deficient in constipated patients, were found to increase with EpiCor fermentate in the severe subgroup. In the moderate subgroup, a significant increase in Akkermansia muciniphila was observed.

conclusionsDespite the relatively low dose administered (500 mg/day), particularly when comparing to the high recommended doses for prebiotic fibers, EpiCor fermentate was able to modulate the composition of the gut microbiome, resulting in improvement of constipation-associated symptoms. Conversely, the reported increase in bowel movements may have altered the gut microbial community by increasing those groups of bacteria that are better adapted to a faster gastrointestinal transit time.

trial registrationNCT03051399 at ClinicalTrials.gov. Retrospectively registered. Registration date: 13 February 2017.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAdolescentAdultAgedBiological TherapyConstipationDefecationDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeYoung AdultBacteroidesBacteroidetesConstipationEpiCor fermentateGastrointestinal discomfortGI transit timeGut microbiomeHuman studyPrevotellaSaccharomyces cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID28870194
PMCPMC5584023
OpenAlexW2751556360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.