Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28870191›Full record

Trial reportBMC musculoskeletal disorders2017

Effectiveness of a specific manual approach to the suboccipital region in patients with chronic mechanical neck pain and rotation deficit in the upper cervical spine: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Vanessa González Rueda, Carlos López de Celis, Martín Eusebio Barra López, Andoni Carrasco Uribarren, Sara Castillo Tomás, Cesar Hidalgo García

4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02832232 phase2unknown statusnot on this map

Effectiveness of a Manual Specific Approach to the Suboccipital Area on Pain, Range of Motion, Disability and Clinical Significance of Changes on Patients With Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain and Rotation Deficit of the Upper Cervical Spine

TypeinterventionalSponsorFundacio d'Investigacio en Atencio Primaria Jordi Gol i GurinaRan2016 to 2019Enrolled78ConditionsNeck PainArmstranslational dorsal glide mobilization technique grade III, pressure maintained suboccipital Inhibition technique, Control Group
NCT04545996 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Sub-Occipital Muscles Inhibition Technique and Cranio Cervical Flexion Exercise for Mechanical Neck Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2020 to 2020Enrolled68ConditionsCervical Pain, Mechanical Neck PainArmsSuboccipital Inhibition Technique, Cranio Cervical Flexion Exercises.
NCT05061121 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides and Myofascial Release on Chronic Non-specific Neck Pain : Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2021 to 2022Enrolled59ConditionsNeck PainArmscombined effect
NCT05618964 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Effects Of Deep Neck Flexor And Extensor Exercises On Pain, Range Of Motion And Muscle Strength In Mechanical Neck Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled36ConditionsMechanical Neck PainArmsDeep Neck Flexors & Extensors exercises
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Massage for neck pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vanessa González RuedaRehabilitation Service Baix Llobregat Centre, DAP Costa de Ponent, Catalan Institute of Health, Barcelona, Spain.
Carlos López de CelisRehabilitation Service Baix Llobregat Centre, DAP Costa de Ponent, Catalan Institute of Health, Barcelona, Spain.
Martín Eusebio Barra LópezJordi Gol Institute of Research on Primary Health Care, Barcelona, Spain. martinbarra@gmail.com.
Andoni Carrasco UribarrenFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Sara Castillo TomásFREMAP, Mutual Society for Work-related Injuries and Occupational Diseases, Arnedo, Spain.
Cesar Hidalgo GarcíaFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol · ESUniversidad de Zaragoza · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMechanical neck pain is a highly prevalent problem in primary healthcare settings. Many of these patients have restricted mobility of the cervical spine. Several manual techniques have been recommended for restoring cervical mobility, but their effectiveness in these patients is unknown. The aim of the present study is to compare the effectiveness of two types of specific techniques of the upper neck region: the pressure maintained suboccipital inhibition technique (PMSIT) and the translatory dorsal glide mobilization (TDGM) C0-C1 technique, as adjuncts to a protocolized physiotherapy treatment of the neck region in subjects with chronic mechanical neck pain and rotation deficit in the upper cervical spine.

methodsA randomized, prospective, double-blind (patient and evaluator) clinical trial. The participants (n = 78) will be randomly distributed into three groups. The Control Group will receive a protocolized treatment for 3 weeks, the Mobilization Group will receive the same protocolized treatment and 6 sessions (2 per week) of the TDGM C0-C1 technique, and the Pressure Group will receive the same protocolized treatment and 6 sessions (2 per week) of the PMSIT technique. The intensity of pain (VAS), neck disability (NDI), the cervical range of motion (CROM), headache intensity (HIT-6) and the rating of clinical change (GROC scale) will be measured. The measurements will be performed at baseline, post-treatment and 3 months after the end of treatment, by the same physiotherapist blinded to the group assigned to the subject. DISCUSSION: We believe that an approach including manual treatment to upper cervical dysfunction will be more effective in these patients. Furthermore, the PMSIT technique acts mostly on the musculature, while the TDGM technique acts on the joint. We expect to clarify which component is more effective in improving the upper cervical mobility.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02832232 . Registered on July 13th, 2016.

Indexed as

Cervical VertebraeOccipital BoneRotationChronic PainDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleManipulation, SpinalNeck PainPain MeasurementProspective StudiesRange of Motion, ArticularTreatment OutcomeAtlantoaxial jointCervical vertebraeRange of motionSuboccipital muscle inhibition

Identifiers

PMID28870191
PMCPMC5584013
OpenAlexW2753409673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.