Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28870189›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2017

Can digital stories go where palliative care research has never gone before? A descriptive qualitative study exploring the application of an emerging public health research method in an indigenous palliative care context.

Lisa Williams, Merryn Gott, Tess Moeke-Maxwell, Stella Black, Shuchi Kothari, Sarina Pearson, Tessa Morgan, Matua Rawiri Wharemate, Whaea Whio Hansen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Digital Storytelling in Older Adults With Typical Aging, and With Mild Cognitive Impairment or Dementia: A Systematic Literature Review.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lisa WilliamsSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. la.williams@auckland.ac.nz.
Merryn GottSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Tess Moeke-MaxwellSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Stella BlackSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Shuchi KothariMedia and Communication, School of Social Sciences, Faculty of the Arts, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Sarina PearsonMedia and Communication, School of Social Sciences, Faculty of the Arts, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Tessa MorganSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Matua Rawiri WharemateKaumātua, Te Ārai: Palliative Care and End of Life Research Group, School of Nursing, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Whaea Whio HansenKaumātua, Te Ārai: Palliative Care and End of Life Research Group, School of Nursing, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe World Health Organization (WHO) has called for global approaches to palliative care development. Yet it is questionable whether one-size-fits-all solutions can accommodate international disparities in palliative care need. More flexible research methods are called for in order to understand diverse priorities at local levels. This is especially imperative for Indigenous populations and other groups underrepresented in the palliative care evidence-base. Digital storytelling (DST) offers the potential to be one such method. Digital stories are short first-person videos that tell a story of great significance to the creator. The method has already found a place within public health research and has been described as a useful, emergent method for community-based participatory research.

methodsThe aim of this study was to explore Māori participants' views on DST's usefulness, from an Indigenous perspective, as a research method within the discipline of palliative care. The digital storytelling method was adapted to include Māori cultural protocols. Data capturing participant experience of the study were collected using participant observation and anonymous questionnaires. Eight participants, seven women and one man, took part. Field notes and questionnaire data were analysed using critical thematic analysis.

resultsTwo main themes were identified during analyses: 1) issues that facilitated digital storytelling's usefulness as a research method for Māori reporting on end of life caregiving; and 2) issues that hindered this process. All subthemes identified: recruitment, the pōwhiri process, (Māori formal welcome of visitors) and technology, related to both main themes and are presented in this way.

conclusionDigital storytelling is an emerging method useful for exploring Indigenous palliative care issues. In line with a Health Promoting Palliative Care approach that centres research in communities, it helps meet the need for diverse approaches to involve underrepresented groups.

Indexed as

NarrationAdultAgedCultural CompetencyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPalliative CarePopulation GroupsPublic HealthQualitative ResearchResearch DesignSurveys and QuestionnairesDigital storytellingEnd of life careIndigenous palliative careKaupapa MāoriMāoriPalliative careResearch methods

Identifiers

PMID28870189
PMCPMC5584042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.