ArticleBMC women's health2017
Differences in drug use between men and women: an Italian cross sectional study.
Article in BMC women's health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.
- Medicine storage, wastage, and associated determinants among urban households: a systematic review and meta-analysis of household surveys.BMC public health · 2021Pooled it
- The European Drug-Drug Interaction (EuroDDI) Study Protocol: A Cross-Country Comparison of Drug-Drug Interaction Prevalence in the Older Community-Dwelling Population.Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2025Article
- Sex Differences in Cardiovascular Diseases: Exploring the Role of Microbiota and Immunity.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- The distribution of disease in the Republic of Suriname - A pharmacoepidemiological analysis using the claims database of the State Health Foundation of the year 2017.Journal of public health and epidemiology · 2021Article
- Drug-utilisation profiles and COVID-19.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Did the introduction and increased prescribing of antidepressants lead to changes in long-term trends of suicide rates?European journal of public health · 2021Article
- Gender Differences in Medication Use: A Drug Utilization Study Based on Real World Data.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- In Vitro Characterization, Modelling, and Antioxidant Properties of Polyphenon-60 from Green Tea in Eudragit S100-2 Chitosan Microspheres.Nutrients · 2020Article
- An Updated Overview on Nanonutraceuticals: Focus on Nanoprebiotics and Nanoprobiotics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Nanopharmaceutics: Part II-Production Scales and Clinically Compliant Production Methods.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Nanopharmaceutics: Part I-Clinical Trials Legislation and Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) of Nanotherapeutics in the EU.Pharmaceutics · 2020Review
- Multiple Cell Signalling Pathways of Human Proinsulin C-Peptide in Vasculopathy Protection.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- New Nanotechnologies for the Treatment and Repair of Skin Burns Infections.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Patient Centric Pharmaceutical Drug Product Design-The Impact on Medication Adherence.Pharmaceutics · 2020Review
- The Pomace Extract Taurisolo Protects Rat Brain From Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2020Article
- Drug Utilization Pattern of Antibiotics: The Role of Age, Sex and Municipalities in Determining Variation.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2020Article
- Geographical Variation in Medication Prescriptions: A Multiregional Drug-Utilization Study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020Article
- Nanoparticle Delivery Systems in the Treatment of Diabetes Complications.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- Transferrin-Conjugated Docetaxel-PLGA Nanoparticles for Tumor Targeting: Influence on MCF-7 Cell Cycle.Polymers · 2019Article
- Sirtuins and SIRT6 in Carcinogenesis and in Diet.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDrugs are the most important treatment option for most diseases, and the majority of medical consultations result in a prescription. Women and men receive different drug prescriptions and differ in therapeutic response to pharmacological therapy. This disparity is due to biological factors (sex differences) or/and behavior, lifestyle and life experience (gender differences). Sex differences in drug use have been demonstrated in several therapeutic areas; however, there is a lack of overviews on sex and gender differences of drug use in an entire population.
methodsWe conducted a descriptive cross - sectional drug use study, involving the entire Italian population in 2012, aimed at showing and analyzing differences between men and women as regards their exposure to drugs. The data source was IMS LifeLink Treatment DynamicsTMLRx Database and it included all prescribed drugs reimbursed by the Italian National Healthcare System in 2012 and covered 90% of the entire Italian population. The information about the prescriptions was stratified by men and women and age. Drug consumption was expressed as DDD/ 1000 ab die. Exposure to drug prescriptions was expressed as period prevalence (the proportion of the population dispensed ≥1 prescription in 2012 per 1000 inhabitants). Differences of prevalence between men and women were expressed as crude and age adjusted risk ratios with 95% CI.
resultsOur findings suggested that the largest differences in drug prescriptions regarded drugs affecting bone structure and mineralization (RR 15.9), calcium (RR 8.6) and thyroid therapy (RR 5.4), dispensed more to women than men. Otherwise ACE inhibitors were more commonly used in men.
conclusionsThis is the first study exploring difference in drug use between men and women and carried out on the entire Italian population. Our findings showed substantial differences between men and women in term of prevalence of drug prescriptions. Some differences in drug use may be explained by sex differences (variations in disease prevalence and severity, pathophysiology, or by other biological differences), other differences need further investigation to explain the apparent lack of a rational medical explanation for some findings. The findings may subsequently be used to plan future studies to address differences suggesting inequity in treatment approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.