Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28869662›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of caring sciences2018

Parent Caring Response Scoring System: development and psychometric evaluation in the context of childhood cancer-related port starts.

Jinbing Bai, Kristen Swanson, Felicity W K Harper, Louis A Penner, Sheila J Santacroce

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of caring sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Longitudinal Analysis of Parent Communication Behaviors and Child Distress during Cancer Port Start Procedures.Pain management nursing : official journal of the American Society of Pain Management Nurses · 2018
    Article
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jinbing BaiNell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6726-5714
Kristen SwansonCollege of Nursing, Seattle University, Seattle, WA, USA.
Felicity W K HarperSchool of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Louis A PennerSchool of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Sheila J SantacroceSchool of Nursing, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Funding

Resources, Parent-Child Communication and Adjustment to Pediatric CancerR01CA138981 · NCI · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI PENNER, LOUIS A. · 2009 to 2014
$3.0M
National Institute of Health R01CA138981NCI NIH HHS R01 CA138981Sigma Theta Tau (STT) Alpha Alpha Chapter
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleMultiple observational coding systems have been developed and validated to assess parent-child interactions during painful procedures. Most of these coding systems are neither theory-based nor do they well represent parent nonverbal behaviours.

aimsDevelop the Parent Caring Response Scoring System (P-CaReSS) based on Swanson's Theory of Caring and test its psychometric properties in children in cancer port starts.

methodsA hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding was used to formulate the preliminary observational codes for the P-CaReSS. Twenty-nine children, each with one video-recording of port start available, were selected from the parent study (R01CA138981) to refine the P-CaReSS, train coders and test inter-rater reliability. Videos of another 43 children were used to evaluate the construct validity of P-CaReSS. Per cent agreement and Cohen's kappa were used to present the inter-rater reliability. Spearman rank-order correlations were used to report the construct validity.

resultsThe 18-item P-CaReSS includes three types of parent behaviours: verbal, nonverbal and emotional behaviours. These parent interaction behaviours comprise five caring domains - knowing, being with, doing for, enabling, and maintaining belief - and one noncaring domain. On average the per cent agreement was 0.82 for the P-CaReSS overall, with average per cent agreements above 0.80 for both verbal and nonverbal behaviours. Kappa coefficient was 0.81 for the emotional behaviour. The behavioural codes in the P-CaReSS showed significant correlations with independent ratings of parent distress, child distress and child cooperation.

conclusionsThe P-CaReSS is a promising tool that can be used to evaluate parent verbal, nonverbal and emotional behaviours during cancer-related port starts. This observational tool can be used to guide the development of nursing interventions to help parents caring for their child during cancer procedures.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalStress, PsychologicalVascular Access DevicesAdultCaregiversChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasmsParent-Child RelationsParentsPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairescaringmeasurepainful procedureparent-child interactionpsychometric property

Identifiers

PMID28869662
PMCPMC5835157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.