Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28869519›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2017

Differences in Sulfotyrosine Binding amongst CXCR1 and CXCR2 Chemokine Ligands.

Natasha A Moussouras, Anthony E Getschman, Emily R Lackner, Christopher T Veldkamp, Michael B Dwinell, Brian F Volkman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Regulation of Chemokine-Receptor Interactions and Functions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Natasha A MoussourasDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA. nmoussouras@mcw.edu.
Anthony E GetschmanDepartment of Biochemistry, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA. agetschman@mcw.edu.
Emily R LacknerDepartment of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Whitewater, Whitewater, WI 53190, USA. LacknerER29@uww.edu.
Christopher T VeldkampDepartment of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Whitewater, Whitewater, WI 53190, USA. veldkamc@uww.edu.
Michael B DwinellDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA. mdwinell@mcw.edu.
Brian F VolkmanDepartment of Biochemistry, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA. bvolkman@mcw.edu.
Medical College of Wisconsin · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Whitewater · US

Funding

Medical Scientist Training ProgramT32GM080202 · NIGMS · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI BARBIERI, JOSEPH T, SALZMAN, NITA H · 2010 to 2024
$5.7M
Structural Basis for Chemokine FunctionR01AI058072 · NIAID · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI VOLKMAN, BRIAN F · 2004 to 2019
$4.1M
Sulfotyrosine-guided discovery of small molecule chemokine inhibitorsR01GM097381 · NIGMS · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI VOLKMAN, BRIAN F · 2011 to 2021
$2.9M
Structural Basis for Chemokine FunctionR37AI058072 · NIAID · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI Brian F Volkman · 2020 to 2026
$2.8M
High Performance Digital Console and Sample JetS10OD020000 · OD · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI VOLKMAN, BRIAN F · 2015 to 2015
$600k
Mechanism behind CCL21/CCR7-mediated pancreatic cancer progressionF30CA210587 · NCI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI MOUSSOURAS, NATASHA A · 2016 to 2020
$231k
NCI NIH HHS F30 CA210587NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI058072NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI058072NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM097381NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM080202NIH HHS S10 OD020000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tyrosine sulfation, a post-translational modification found on many chemokine receptors, typically increases receptor affinity for the chemokine ligand. A previous bioinformatics analysis suggested that a sulfotyrosine (sY)-binding site on the surface of the chemokine CXCL12 may be conserved throughout the chemokine family. However, the extent to which receptor tyrosine sulfation contributes to chemokine binding has been examined in only a few instances. Computational solvent mapping correctly identified the conserved sulfotyrosine-binding sites on CXCL12 and CCL21 detected by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, demonstrating its utility for hot spot analysis in the chemokine family. In this study, we analyzed five chemokines that bind to CXCR2, a subset of which also bind to CXCR1, to identify hot spots that could participate in receptor binding. A cleft containing the predicted sulfotyrosine-binding pocket was identified as a principal hot spot for ligand binding on the structures of CXCL1, CXCL2, CXCL7, and CXCL8, but not CXCL5. Sulfotyrosine titrations monitored via NMR spectroscopy showed specific binding to CXCL8, but not to CXCL5, which is consistent with the predictions from the computational solvent mapping. The lack of CXCL5-sulfotyrosine interaction and the presence of CXCL8-sulfotyrosine binding suggests a role for receptor post-translational modifications regulating ligand selectivity.

Indexed as

Binding SitesHumansLigandsMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyModels, MolecularMolecular ConformationProtein BindingReceptors, Interleukin-8AReceptors, Interleukin-8BStructure-Activity RelationshipTyrosineLigandsReceptors, Interleukin-8AReceptors, Interleukin-8BTyrosinetyrosine O-sulfatechemokinesCXCL5CXCL8CXCR1CXCR2NMRpost-translational modificationsulfotyrosine

Identifiers

PMID28869519
PMCPMC5618543
OpenAlexW2751861043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.