Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28869493›Full record

ReviewToxins2017

Vaccines against Botulism.

Grace Sundeen, Joseph T Barbieri

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxins, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Development and evaluation of a tetravalent botulinum vaccine.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2022
    Article
  13. Major pathogenicIranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Review
  17. Biodefence research two decades on: worth the investment?The Lancet. Infectious diseases · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Grace SundeenDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA. gsundeen@mcw.edu.
Joseph T BarbieriDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA. jtb01@mcw.edu.
Medical College of Wisconsin · US

Funding

Vaccines Against BotulismR01AI118389 · NIAID · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI BARBIERI, JOSEPH T, PELLETT, SABINE · 2015 to 2024
$6.1M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI118389
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Botulinum neurotoxins (BoNT) cause the flaccid paralysis of botulism by inhibiting the release of acetylcholine from motor neurons. There are seven serotypes of BoNT (A-G), with limited therapies, and no FDA approved vaccine for botulism. An investigational formalin-inactivated penta-serotype-BoNT/A-E toxoid vaccine was used to vaccinate people who are at high risk of contracting botulism. However, this formalin-inactivated penta-serotype-BoNT/A-E toxoid vaccine was losing potency and was discontinued. This article reviews the different vaccines being developed to replace the discontinued toxoid vaccine. These vaccines include DNA-based, viral vector-based, and recombinant protein-based vaccines. DNA-based vaccines include plasmids or viral vectors containing the gene encoding one of the BoNT heavy chain receptor binding domains (HC). Viral vectors reviewed are adenovirus, influenza virus, rabies virus, Semliki Forest virus, and Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis virus. Among the potential recombinant protein vaccines reviewed are HC, light chain-heavy chain translocation domain, and chemically or genetically inactivated holotoxin.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacterial VaccinesBotulismHumansBacterial Vaccinesbotulinum neurotoxinsbotulismgenetically inactivated toxoidsplasmid vectorstoxoidsvaccinesviral vectors

Identifiers

PMID28869493
PMCPMC5618201
OpenAlexW2753299301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.