Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28869397›Full record

SynthesisDento maxillo facial radiology2018

Precision of cone beam CT to assess periodontal bone defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Letícia Fernanda Haas, Glaucia Santos Zimmermann, G De Luca Canto, Carlos Flores-Mir, Márcio Corrêa

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Dento maxillo facial radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Special Issue "Artificial Intelligence in Oral Health".Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Letícia Fernanda Haas1 Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
Glaucia Santos Zimmermann2 Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
G De Luca Canto2 Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Carlos Flores-Mir3 Department of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Márcio Corrêa2 Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Santa Catarina, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesEvaluate the diagnostic validity of CBCT in measuring periodontal bone defects when compared with the reference standard (in situ measurement).

methodsStudies in which the main objective was to evaluate the diagnostic validity of CBCT in measuring periodontal bone defects when compared with the reference standard were selected. Four databases were searched. The studies were selected by two independent reviewers. The methodology of selected studies was assessed using the 14-item Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. The quality of evidence and strength of recommendation was assessed by The Grading of Recommendations Assessment Tool, Development and Evaluation.

resultsUsing a selection process in two phases, 16 studies were identified and, in seven articles meta-analysis was performed. The results from these meta-analyses showed that no difference between the measurements of CBCT and in situ for alveolar bone loss, and demonstrated a concordance of 82.82% between CBCT and in situ for the classification of the degree of furcation involvement.

conclusionsBased on a moderate level of evidence, CBCT could be useful for furcation involvement periodontal cases, but it should only be used in cases where clinical evaluation and conventional radiographic imaging do not provide the information necessary for an adequate diagnosis and proper periodontal treatment planning.

Indexed as

Alveolar Bone LossCone-Beam Computed TomographyHumansPeriodontal DiseasesSensitivity and Specificityalveolar bone losscone beam computed tomographyfurcation defectsperiodontal bone losssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID28869397
PMCPMC5965906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.