Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28868791›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2017

Predicting hemispheric dominance for language production in healthy individuals using support vector machine.

Laure Zago, Pierre-Yves Hervé, Robin Genuer, Alexandre Laurent, Bernard Mazoyer, Nathalie Tzourio-Mazoyer, Marc Joliot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The molecular and cellular underpinnings of human brain lateralization.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laure ZagoUniversité de Bordeaux, Institut des Maladies Neurodégéneratives, UMR 5293, Groupe d'Imagerie Neurofonctionnelle, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8235-2154
Pierre-Yves HervéUniversité de Bordeaux, Institut des Maladies Neurodégéneratives, UMR 5293, Groupe d'Imagerie Neurofonctionnelle, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.
Robin GenuerUniversité de Bordeaux, ISPED, Centre INSERM U-1219, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.
Alexandre LaurentUniversité de Bordeaux, Institut des Maladies Neurodégéneratives, UMR 5293, Groupe d'Imagerie Neurofonctionnelle, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.
Bernard MazoyerUniversité de Bordeaux, Institut des Maladies Neurodégéneratives, UMR 5293, Groupe d'Imagerie Neurofonctionnelle, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.
Nathalie Tzourio-MazoyerUniversité de Bordeaux, Institut des Maladies Neurodégéneratives, UMR 5293, Groupe d'Imagerie Neurofonctionnelle, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.
Marc JoliotUniversité de Bordeaux, Institut des Maladies Neurodégéneratives, UMR 5293, Groupe d'Imagerie Neurofonctionnelle, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We used a Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier to assess hemispheric pattern of language dominance of 47 individuals categorized as non-typical for language from their hemispheric functional laterality index (HFLI) measured on a sentence minus word-list production fMRI-BOLD contrast map. The SVM classifier was trained at discriminating between Dominant and Non-Dominant hemispheric language production activation pattern on a group of 250 participants previously identified as Typicals (HFLI strongly leftward). Then, SVM was applied to each hemispheric language activation pattern of 47 non-typical individuals. The results showed that at least one hemisphere (left or right) was found to be Dominant in every, except 3 individuals, indicating that the "dominant" type of functional organization is the most frequent in non-typicals. Specifically, left hemisphere dominance was predicted in all non-typical right-handers (RH) and in 57.4% of non-typical left-handers (LH). When both hemisphere classifications were jointly considered, four types of brain patterns were observed. The most often predicted pattern (51%) was left-dominant (Dominant left-hemisphere and Non-Dominant right-hemisphere), followed by right-dominant (23%, Dominant right-hemisphere and Non-Dominant left-hemisphere) and co-dominant (19%, 2 Dominant hemispheres) patterns. Co-non-dominant was rare (6%, 2 Non-Dominant hemispheres), but was normal variants of hemispheric specialization. In RH, only left-dominant (72%) and co-dominant patterns were detected, while for LH, all types were found, although with different occurrences. Among the 10 LH with a strong rightward HFLI, 8 had a right-dominant brain pattern. Whole-brain analysis of the right-dominant pattern group confirmed that it exhibited a functional organization strictly mirroring that of left-dominant pattern group. Hum Brain Mapp 38:5871-5889, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

Functional LateralityLanguageMagnetic Resonance ImagingSupport Vector MachineAdolescentAdultBrainBrain MappingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSelf ReportYoung AdultatypicalfMRIhemispheric specializationlanguage productionleft-handerssupport vector machine

Identifiers

PMID28868791
PMCPMC6867031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.