ArticleHuman brain mapping2017
Predicting hemispheric dominance for language production in healthy individuals using support vector machine.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular and cellular correlates of human cortical lateralization.Communications biology · 2026Article
- The molecular and cellular underpinnings of human brain lateralization.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- The reliability of bilateral cerebral laterality for word generation: Who is left in the middle?Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Imaging genetics of language network functional connectivity reveals links with language-related abilities, dyslexia and handedness.Communications biology · 2024Article
- The Second-Set Surgeries for Multiple Unruptured Aneurysms Do Not Increase Perioperative Complications.Neurosurgery practice · 2024Article
- Atlas for the Lateralized Visuospatial Attention Networks (ALANs): Insights from fMRI and network analyses.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Impact of cannabis use on brain metabolism usingNeuroradiology · 2023Article
- Review
- Relations between hemispheric asymmetries of grey matter and auditory processing of spoken syllables in 281 healthy adults.Brain structure & function · 2022Article
- Article
- Left-handed musicians show a higher probability of atypical cerebral dominance for language.Human brain mapping · 2020Article
- A SENtence Supramodal Areas AtlaS (SENSAAS) based on multiple task-induced activation mapping and graph analysis of intrinsic connectivity in 144 healthy right-handers.Brain structure & function · 2019Article
- Quantifying the Confidence in fMRI-Based Language Lateralisation Through Laterality Index Deconstruction.Frontiers in neurology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We used a Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier to assess hemispheric pattern of language dominance of 47 individuals categorized as non-typical for language from their hemispheric functional laterality index (HFLI) measured on a sentence minus word-list production fMRI-BOLD contrast map. The SVM classifier was trained at discriminating between Dominant and Non-Dominant hemispheric language production activation pattern on a group of 250 participants previously identified as Typicals (HFLI strongly leftward). Then, SVM was applied to each hemispheric language activation pattern of 47 non-typical individuals. The results showed that at least one hemisphere (left or right) was found to be Dominant in every, except 3 individuals, indicating that the "dominant" type of functional organization is the most frequent in non-typicals. Specifically, left hemisphere dominance was predicted in all non-typical right-handers (RH) and in 57.4% of non-typical left-handers (LH). When both hemisphere classifications were jointly considered, four types of brain patterns were observed. The most often predicted pattern (51%) was left-dominant (Dominant left-hemisphere and Non-Dominant right-hemisphere), followed by right-dominant (23%, Dominant right-hemisphere and Non-Dominant left-hemisphere) and co-dominant (19%, 2 Dominant hemispheres) patterns. Co-non-dominant was rare (6%, 2 Non-Dominant hemispheres), but was normal variants of hemispheric specialization. In RH, only left-dominant (72%) and co-dominant patterns were detected, while for LH, all types were found, although with different occurrences. Among the 10 LH with a strong rightward HFLI, 8 had a right-dominant brain pattern. Whole-brain analysis of the right-dominant pattern group confirmed that it exhibited a functional organization strictly mirroring that of left-dominant pattern group. Hum Brain Mapp 38:5871-5889, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.