Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28868591›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2018

Early CT scanning in the emergency department in patients with penetrating injuries: does it affect outcome?

W J van den Hout, G M van der Wilden, F Boot, F J Idenburg, S J Rhemrev, R Hoencamp

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

W J van den HoutLeiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
G M van der WildenDepartment of Surgery, Haaglanden Medical Center, Lijnbaan 32, 2512 VA, The Hague, The Netherlands. gmvanderwilden@alrijne.nl.
F BootDepartment of Surgery, Haaglanden Medical Center, Lijnbaan 32, 2512 VA, The Hague, The Netherlands.
F J IdenburgDepartment of Surgery, Haaglanden Medical Center, Lijnbaan 32, 2512 VA, The Hague, The Netherlands.
S J RhemrevDepartment of Surgery, Haaglanden Medical Center, Lijnbaan 32, 2512 VA, The Hague, The Netherlands.
R HoencampLeiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Medisch Centrum Haaglanden · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLMinistry of Defence · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo be a level I trauma center in the Netherlands a computed tomography (CT) scanner in the emergency department (ED) is considered desirable, as it is presumed that this optimizes the diagnostic process and that therapy can be directed based on these findings. Aim of this study was to assess the effects of implementing a CT scanner in the ED on outcomes in patients with penetrating injuries.

methodsIn this retrospective descriptive study, patients with penetrating injuries (shot and/or stab wounds), presented between 2000 and 2014 were analysed using the hospital's electronic database, and data from the West Netherlands trauma registry and the financial department.

results405 patients were included: performing a CT scan upon arrival increased significantly from 26.7 to 67.0% (p = 0.00) after implementation of a CT scanner in the ED, with the mean cost of a CT being 96.85 euros. Overall mortality decreased from 6.9 to 3.7%, although not statistically significant. Intensive care unit admission (ICU-admission) and median hospital length of stay (H-LOS) decreased from 30.9 to 24.5% resp. 3.2 to 1.8 days (p ≤ 0.05). Overall mortality, adjusted for injury severity score (ISS), revised trauma score (RTS), and types of injuries, did not change significantly.

conclusionPatients with penetrating injuries more often received a CT scan on admission after implementation of a CT scanner in the ED. Early CT scanning is useful since it significantly reduces ICU-admissions and decreases H-LOS. It is a cheap and non-invasive diagnostic tool with significant clinical impact, resulting in directed treatment, and improvement of outcomes.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalAdultFemaleHumansInjury Severity ScoreMaleNetherlandsRegistriesRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedTrauma CentersWounds, GunshotWounds, StabCT scanDiagnosticsPenetrating injuryTrauma

Identifiers

PMID28868591
PMCPMC6096612
OpenAlexW2751839578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.