ArticleInvestigative and clinical urology2017
Does T1- and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging give value-added than bone scintigraphy in the follow-up of vertebral metastasis of prostate cancer?
Article in Investigative and clinical urology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Spinal metastasis: diagnosis, management and follow-up.The British journal of radiology · 2019Pooled it
- The value of T1 mapping and intravoxel incoherent motion parameters in predicting PD-L1 expression and dynamically monitoring immunotherapy in advanced lung cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the effectiveness of limited Magnetic Resonance (MR) images including T1- and diffusion-weighted image (DWI) for monitoring vertebral metastasis in patients with prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND
methodsFrom July 2014 to November 2016, patients diagnosed with spinal metastasis from prostate cancer using 99mTc bone scintigraphy were enrolled. Regardless of the primary local therapy, the changes in spinal metastasis were followed up using bone scan and biparametric MR (T1+DWI). All tests were followed up for more than 3 months.
resultsAmong the 14 follow-ups of 10 patients, 6 and 10 (including all progressed cases on bone scan) follow-ups were determined to show progressive disease using bone scan and biparametric MR, respectively. Otherwise, we could have predicted neurologic sequela earlier using biparametric MR. Examination time for biparametric MR was 15 minutes, and it was 4 hours for bone scan, respectively.
conclusionsAlthough bone scan has been considered the standard test for bony metastasis in men with prostate cancer, limited MR including T1 and DWI has an additional benefit in monitoring spinal metastasis in patients who are already diagnosed as having spinal metastasis. The limited MR is more sensitive in detecting progressive disease. In addition, it can reduce neurologic complications caused by spinal metastasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.