ReviewGE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology
Biopsies in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: When and How.
Review in GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of replacing lansoprazole with vonoprazan for treating erosive oesophagitis.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2025Trial
- Artificial intelligence in small tissue biopsies: diagnostic applications, histochemical integration, and methodological challenges in surgical pathology.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2026Review
- An Integrated Review of Conventional and Emerging Diagnostic and Therapeutic Modalities to Reduce the Risk of Surgical Resections in Intestinal Tuberculosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Validation of a Gastric-Juice-Analysis-Based Approach toDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Resource Optimization in the Examination of Macroscopic Normal Colon Mucosa.Endoscopy international open · 2026Article
- Current and emerging approaches to manage chronic inflammatory gut disorders.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Retrosternal Burning and Its Endoscopic Associations: Findings from 5,561 Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopies.Iranian journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Advancing Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Detection: A Single-Center Pilot Study Exploring the Potential of Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy in Endoscopic Procedures.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2025Article
- Endoscopic Management of Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A Narrative Review on Diagnosis and Treatment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Molecularly Imprinted Polymer Advanced Hydrogels as Tools for Gastrointestinal Diagnostics.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in the general population in Wuzhou, China: a cross-sectional study.Infectious agents and cancer · 2025Article
- Summary of gastroscopy quality indicators applicable in clinical practice.Przeglad gastroenterologiczny · 2025Review
- Bridging the gap in gastrointestinal healthcare in a resource-limited setup: Feasibility study of weekend endoscopy services in Southwest Ethiopia.Endoscopy international open · 2025Article
- COVID-19-induced gastrointestinal autonomic dysfunction: A systematic review.World journal of clinical cases · 2023Article
- Robotic Autonomy for Magnetic Endoscope Biopsy.IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics · 2022Article
- Gastric Cancer Pre-Stage Detection and Early Diagnosis of Gastritis Using Serum Protein Signatures.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Active Stabilization of Interventional Tasks Utilizing a Magnetically Manipulated Endoscope.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2022Article
- Current state of prognostication, therapy and prospective innovations for Barrett's-related esophageal adenocarcinoma: a literature review.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2021Review
- Towards virtual biopsies of gastrointestinal tissues using photoacoustic remote sensing microscopy.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2021Article
- Intelligent magnetic manipulation for gastrointestinal ultrasound.Science robotics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastrointestinal endoscopy and the acquisition of tissue samples are essential for the diagnosis and treatment of various diseases of the digestive system. However, given the differences between the recommendations and the clinical practice, the inexorable increase of requests for endoscopic examinations and the financial burden associated with it, it is crucial that we concentrate on the challenge that endoscopic biopsies represent. In this review we describe the available evidence in the literature, including the more recent published guidelines, on when or not to perform endoscopic biopsies in upper and lower endoscopy, focusing on the precise diagnosis of the most common gastrointestinal diseases that motivate endoscopic examinations and on the rational use of available resources without compromising proper management of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.