Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28868328›Full record

ArticleBio-protocol2017

Creating a RAW264.7 CRISPR-Cas9 Genome Wide Library.

Brooke A Napier, Denise M Monack

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bio-protocol, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Macrophage variants in laboratory research: most are well done, but some are RAW.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A small molecule redistributes iron in ferroportin-deficient mice and patient-derived primary macrophages.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brooke A NapierDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Denise M MonackDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Stanford University · US

Funding

Molecular Mechanisms of Inflammasome Activation During Salmonella InfectionsR01AI095396 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MONACK, DENISE M · 2012 to 2020
$3.4M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI095396
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The bacterial clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-Cas9 genome editing tools are used in mammalian cells to knock-out specific genes of interest to elucidate gene function. The CRISPR-Cas9 system requires that the mammalian cell expresses Cas9 endonuclease, guide RNA (gRNA) to lead the endonuclease to the gene of interest, and the PAM sequence that links the Cas9 to the gRNA. CRISPR-Cas9 genome wide libraries are used to screen the effect of each gene in the genome on the cellular phenotype of interest, in an unbiased high-throughput manner. In this protocol, we describe our method of creating a CRISPR-Cas9 genome wide library in a transformed murine macrophage cell-line (RAW264.7). We have employed this library to identify novel mediators in the caspase-11 cell death pathway (Napier

Indexed as

CRISPRLibraryMacrophagesRAW264.7Screen

Identifiers

PMID28868328
PMCPMC5580966
OpenAlexW2620157949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.