Article3 Biotech2017
Molecular and phytochemical analysis of wild type and olive cultivars grown under Saudi Arabian environment.
Article in 3 Biotech, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- An integrated approach using morphological, biochemical, and RAPD markers to assess the genetic diversity of Olive (Olea Europaea L.) cultivars in India.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Review
- ISSR-Based Genetic Diversity Assessment of GenusPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Genetic Identification of the Wild Form of Olive (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to assess genetic variability at molecular and phytochemical levels among the four most commonly grown olive cultivars and the wild-type olive of Saudi Arabia. Sixty-six and 80 amplicons were generated from 9 random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and inter simple sequence repeats (ISSR) primers, each, producing an average of 95.9 and 86.44% polymorphism for the two markers, respectively. The PIC values were 82.2% for the RAPD and 85.4% for the ISSR markers and the discrimination power for both the markers was 11.1%. The UPGMA cluster analysis based on the RAPD and ISSR data resulted in the aggregation of cultivars and wild accession with a good bootstrapping value according to their origin. Furthermore, a total of 199 compounds were identified in the cultivars based on peak area, retention time, and molecular formula using GC-MS analyses of methanolic and ethanolic extracts. These compounds were classified according to their chemical class; most of them were fatty acids, alcoholic compounds, carboxylic acids, aldehydes, heterocyclic compounds, ketones, alkanes, and phenols. Genetic and phytochemical distances were significantly correlated, based on the Mantel test. The Saudi wild accession also had high numbers of fatty acids and their esters, and can be used in breeding programs for generating new genotypes with interesting characters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.