Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28868131›Full record

ReviewF1000Research2017

Circulating tumor cells: silent predictors of metastasis.

LanLan Zhou, David T Dicker, Elizabeth Matthew, Wafik S El-Deiry, R Katherine Alpaugh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in F1000Research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Metastatic Latency, a Veiled Threat.Frontiers in immunology · 2019
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

LanLan ZhouFox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
David T DickerFox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Elizabeth MatthewFox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Wafik S El-DeiryFox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
R Katherine AlpaughFox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6775-5323

Funding

Immunopheonotyping of circulating tumor cellsR21CA181419 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI EL-DEIRY, WAFIK S. · 2014 to 2015
$403k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA181419
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) were added to the arsenal of clinical testing in 2004 for three cancer types: metastatic breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer. CTCs were found to be an independent prognostic indicator of survival for these three diseases. Multiple enrichment/isolation strategies have been developed and numerous assay applications have been performed using both single and pooled captured/enriched CTCs. We have reviewed the isolation techniques and touched on many analyses. The true utility of a CTC is that it acts as a "silent" predictor of metastatic disease. The mere presence of a single CTC is an indication that disease has spread from the primary site. Comments and suggestions have been set forth for CTCs and cell-free DNA to be used as a screening panel for the early detection of disease recurrence and metastatic spread, providing the opportunity for early intervention with curative intent to treat metastatic disease.

Indexed as

Circulating Tumour CellsCTCImmunophenotypingIsolation TechniqueOncology

Identifiers

PMID28868131
PMCPMC5558099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.