Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28868055›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2017

Investigation of the Influence of Leaf Thickness on Canopy Reflectance and Physiological Traits in Upland and Pima Cotton Populations.

Duke Pauli, Jeffrey W White, Pedro Andrade-Sanchez, Matthew M Conley, John Heun, Kelly R Thorp, Andrew N French, Douglas J Hunsaker, Elizabete Carmo-Silva, Guangyao Wang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Leaf thickness of barley: genetic dissection, candidate genes prediction and its relationship with yield-related traits.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Duke PauliPlant Breeding and Genetics Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell UniversityIthaca, NY, United States.
Jeffrey W WhiteUnited States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Arid Land Agricultural Research CenterMaricopa, AZ, United States.
Pedro Andrade-SanchezDepartment of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, Maricopa Agricultural Center, University of ArizonaMaricopa, AZ, United States.
Matthew M ConleyUnited States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Arid Land Agricultural Research CenterMaricopa, AZ, United States.
John HeunDepartment of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, Maricopa Agricultural Center, University of ArizonaMaricopa, AZ, United States.
Kelly R ThorpUnited States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Arid Land Agricultural Research CenterMaricopa, AZ, United States.
Andrew N FrenchUnited States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Arid Land Agricultural Research CenterMaricopa, AZ, United States.
Douglas J HunsakerUnited States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Arid Land Agricultural Research CenterMaricopa, AZ, United States.
Elizabete Carmo-SilvaUnited States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Arid Land Agricultural Research CenterMaricopa, AZ, United States.
Guangyao WangMaricopa Agricultural Center, School of Plant Sciences, University of ArizonaMaricopa, AZ, United States.
Michael A GorePlant Breeding and Genetics Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell UniversityIthaca, NY, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many systems for field-based, high-throughput phenotyping (FB-HTP) quantify and characterize the reflected radiation from the crop canopy to derive phenotypes, as well as infer plant function and health status. However, given the technology's nascent status, it remains unknown how biophysical and physiological properties of the plant canopy impact downstream interpretation and application of canopy reflectance data. In that light, we assessed relationships between leaf thickness and several canopy-associated traits, including normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), which was collected via active reflectance sensors carried on a mobile FB-HTP system, carbon isotope discrimination (CID), and chlorophyll content. To investigate the relationships among traits, two distinct cotton populations, an upland (

Indexed as

abiotic stresscanopy reflectancecottonhigh-throughput phenotypingleaf thicknessspecific leaf weight

Identifiers

PMID28868055
PMCPMC5563404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.