ArticleBulletin of the World Health Organization2017
A guide to aid the selection of diagnostic tests.
Article in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 173 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
173 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Urinary nephrin-a potential marker of early glomerular injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of nephrology · 2024Pooled it
- Diagnosis of visceral and cutaneous leishmaniasis using loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) protocols: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Parasites & vectors · 2022Pooled it
- Binary and WHO dysplasia grading systems for the prediction of malignant transformation of oral leukoplakia and erythroplakia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical oral investigations · 2021Pooled it
- Usefulness of C-Reactive Protein and Other Host BioMarker Point-of-Care Tests in the Assessment of Non-Malarial Acute Febrile Illnesses: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2020Pooled it
- Novel paradigm enables accurate monthly gestational screening to prevent congenital toxoplasmosis and more.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2024Trial
- Antigen rapid tests, nasopharyngeal PCR and saliva PCR to detect SARS-CoV-2: A prospective comparative clinical trial.PloS one · 2023Trial
- Europium nanoparticle-based lateral flow assay for rapid detection of herpes simplex virus 2-specific antibodies in serum: a preliminary evaluation.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Machine learning-driven cancer diagnostics with improved robustness and interpretability.Chemical science · 2026Review
- Nanozymes in Point-of-Care Testing: Classification, Biosensing Strategies, and Integrated Applications.Chemical record (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Review
- Unsuitable Decisions and Persistent Infection: The Reality of Farmer and Veterinarian Mastitis Treatment Decisions in Denmark.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Design of an artificial intelligence model to screen spontaneous speech to detect Alzheimer's Disease.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Assessments of the in vitro diagnostic kits landscape and availability from selected hospitals and health-related facilities in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- A Systematic Review of Pain Drawings for Perioperative Patient Management.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Ultrasensitive Enzyme-Free Detection of Proteins on Magnetic Beads.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026Article
- Membrane Fusion-Inspired Nanomaterials: Emerging Strategies for Infectious Disease and Cancer Diagnostics.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Using dried blood spots to estimate Toxoplasma gondii seroprevalence in pregnant women in Catalonia, Spain, and to serologically diagnose congenital toxoplasmosis.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
- How to identify respiratory pathogens in primary health care - a review on the benefits, prospects and pitfalls in using point of care tests.Infection · 2025Review
- PRICE: a personalized recursive intelligent cost effectiveness analysis framework for rare disease diagnosis.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Photonic Crystal Microarray-Assisted Point-of-Care Testing for Rapid and Convenient Detection of Microalbuminuria.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Clinical evaluation of a novel Mologic malaria Plasmodium falciparum LDH-dependent lateral flow rapid diagnostic test diagnostic accuracy: a cross-sectional study, Sudan.Malaria journal · 2025Article
113 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, a wide range of diagnostic tests has become available for use in resource-constrained settings. Accordingly, a huge number of guidelines, performance evaluations and implementation reports have been produced. However, this wealth of information is unstructured and of uneven quality, which has made it difficult for end-users, such as clinics, laboratories and health ministries, to determine which test would be best for improving clinical care and patient outcomes in a specific context. This paper outlines a six-step guide to the selection and implementation of in vitro diagnostic tests based on Médecins Sans Frontières' practical experience: (i) define the test's purpose; (ii) review the market; (iii) ascertain regulatory approval; (iv) determine the test's diagnostic accuracy under ideal conditions; (v) determine the test's diagnostic accuracy in clinical practice; and (vi) monitor the test's performance in routine use. Gaps in the information needed to complete these six steps and gaps in regulatory systems are highlighted. Finally, ways of improving the quality of diagnostic tests are suggested, such as establishing a model list of essential diagnostics, establishing a repository of information on the design of diagnostic studies and improving quality control and postmarketing surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.