Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28867364›Full record

ReviewNeuropharmacology2018

Cell-based and pharmacological neurorestorative therapies for ischemic stroke.

Poornima Venkat, Yi Shen, Michael Chopp, Jieli Chen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuropharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Innovative approaches for the treatment of stroke: a recent update.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Poornima VenkatDepartment of Neurology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA.
Yi ShenDepartment of Neurology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA; Gerontology Institute, Department of Neurology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin Neurological Institute, Key Laboratory of Post-Neurotrauma Neurorepair and Regeneration in Central Nervous System, Ministry of Education and Tianjin City, Tianjin, 300052, China.
Michael ChoppDepartment of Neurology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA; Department of Physics, Oakland University, Rochester, MI, 48309, USA.
Jieli ChenDepartment of Neurology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA; Gerontology Institute, Department of Neurology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin Neurological Institute, Key Laboratory of Post-Neurotrauma Neurorepair and Regeneration in Central Nervous System, Ministry of Education and Tianjin City, Tianjin, 300052, China. Electronic address: jchen4@hfhs.org.
Henry Ford Hospital · USOakland University · USTianjin Medical University General Hospital · CN

Funding

Investigation of D-4F effects of neurovascular remodeling after diabetic strokeR01NS097747 · NINDS · HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM · PI CUI, XU, JIANG, QUAN · 2017 to 2021
$2.2M
Neurorestorative therapy of stroke with HUCBC in type two diabetic miceR01NS083078 · NINDS · HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM · PI CHEN, JIELI · 2014 to 2018
$1.6M
miR-17-92 exosome treatment of strokeR01NS088656 · NINDS · HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM · PI CHOPP, MICHAEL · 2015 to 2019
$1.6M
MiR-126/ABCA1 mediates exosome induced neurorestorative effects after stroke in T2DM miceR01NS099030 · NINDS · HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM · PI CHEN, JIELI · 2016 to 2018
$984k
American Heart Association-American Stroke Association 17POST33410580NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS083078NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS088656NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS097747NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS099030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ischemic stroke remains one of most common causes of death and disability worldwide. Stroke triggers a cascade of events leading to rapid neuronal damage and death. Neuroprotective agents that showed promise in preclinical experiments have failed to translate to the clinic. Even after decades of research, tPA remains the only FDA approved drug for stroke treatment. However, tPA is effective when administered 3-4.5 h after stroke onset and the vast majority of stroke patients do not receive tPA therapy. Therefore, there is a pressing need for novel therapies for ischemic stroke. Since stroke induces rapid cell damage and death, neuroprotective strategies that aim to salvage or replace injured brain tissue are challenged by treatment time frames. To overcome the barriers of neuroprotective therapies, there is an increasing focus on neurorestorative therapies for stroke. In this review article, we provide an update on neurorestorative treatments for stroke using cell therapy such as bone marrow derived mesenchymal stromal cells (BMSCs), human umbilical cord blood cells (HUCBCs) and select pharmacological approaches including Minocycline and Candesartan that have been employed in clinical trials. This review article discusses the present understanding of mechanisms of neurorestorative therapies and summarizes ongoing clinical trials. This article is part of the Special Issue entitled 'Cerebral Ischemia'.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain IschemiaHumansMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationNeuroprotective AgentsStrokeNeuroprotective AgentsCandesartanMesenchymal stromal cellsMicroRNAMinocyclineNeurorestorationNeurovascular remodelingStem cell therapyStrokeSynaptogenesisUmbilical cord blood cellsWhite matter remodeling

Identifiers

PMID28867364
PMCPMC5832535
OpenAlexW2753308185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.