Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28866989›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2017

The mismatch between observational measures and residents' perspectives on the retail food environment: a mixed-methods approach in the Heart Healthy Hoods study.

Julia Díez, Roberto Valiente, Carmen Ramos, Reyes García, Joel Gittelsohn, Manuel Franco

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Community Assets for Health Model and Assessment Scale: A Delphi-Based Analysis and Expert Validation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Dimensions of Community Assets for Health. A Systematised Review and Meta-Synthesis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Data Collection Instruments for Obesogenic Environments in Adults: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Julia DíezSocial and Cardiovascular Epidemiology Research Group, School of Medicine, University of Alcala, Alcala de Henares, Madrid 28871, Spain.
Roberto ValienteSocial and Cardiovascular Epidemiology Research Group, School of Medicine, University of Alcala, Alcala de Henares, Madrid 28871, Spain.
Carmen RamosVillaverde Health Promotion Center, Public Health Institute, Madrid Salud, Madrid City Council, Spain.
Reyes GarcíaVillaverde Health Promotion Center, Public Health Institute, Madrid Salud, Madrid City Council, Spain.
Joel GittelsohnGlobal Obesity Prevention Center at Johns Hopkins, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Manuel FrancoSocial and Cardiovascular Epidemiology Research Group, School of Medicine, University of Alcala, Alcala de Henares, Madrid 28871, Spain.
Universidad de Alcalá · ESMadrid Health Service · ESJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo gain a deeper understanding of the retail food environment by investigating similarities and differences between objective measures and residents' perspectives.

designThe study incorporated Geographic Information System (GIS)-based measures, in-store surveys and the results from a larger photovoice project. We combined these data using a convergent parallel mixed-methods approach.

settingWe conducted this study in a low-income neighbourhood in Madrid (Spain) in 2016. SUBJECTS: We assessed healthy food availability, accessibility and affordability using GIS-based measures and in-store audits. We also analysed the photographs and discussions from twelve participants who engaged in a photovoice project on their food environment.

resultsQuantitative results depicted a widely served and highly accessible retail food environment, in which supermarkets scored highest in terms of healthy food availability (36·5 out of 39) and 98·9 % of residents could access a healthy food store within a walking travel distance of less than 15 min. Qualitative results showed that participants preferred small local businesses over supermarkets, and revealed built environment obstacles for elderly residents. They also highlighted how the socio-economic context constrained residents' food choices.

conclusionsPeople's experienced retail food environment is different from the one quantitatively analysed. Results show the potential of using a mixed-methods approach to enrich food environment research and enhance public health interventions.

Indexed as

Food environmentGeographic Information SystemHealthy eatingMixed-methodsPhotovoicePublic healthSpainUrban health

Identifiers

PMID28866989
PMCPMC10261676
OpenAlexW2752506825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.