Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28866765›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2018

The implementation of web-based cognitive rehabilitation in adult cancer survivors: examining participant engagement, attrition and treatment fidelity.

Mary E Mihuta, Heather J Green

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Strategies to promote the dissemination of psychosocial digital health resources for those affected by cancer: scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mary E MihutaMenzies Health Institute Queensland and School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, 4222, Australia. mary.mihuta@griffithuni.edu.au.
Heather J GreenMenzies Health Institute Queensland and School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, 4222, Australia.
Griffith University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLow engagement and high attrition are common challenges in web-based interventions. Typical measures of engagement reported in the literature are not meaningful for describing participant activity within the intervention and can be misleading. This research aimed to develop a more meaningful method of measuring engagement in an online cognitive rehabilitation program whilst monitoring treatment fidelity.

methodsA pilot study and randomised controlled trial (RCT) were conducted. Data from 60 participants were analysed from three intervention groups: pilot cancer group, pilot non-cancer group and RCT cancer group. Groups completed the 4-week eReCog program comprised of four online modules. Engagement scores were calculated based on activities completed in each module. Attrition, interaction with the program facilitator and correlations with outcome measures were analysed.

resultsOverall engagement in the intervention was high. The non-cancer group participated significantly less than the cancer groups (p = < 0.001), whereby the percentage of activity items completed was 92, 87 and 78% in the pilot cancer, RCT cancer and pilot non-cancer groups, respectively. Attrition was higher in the pilot non-cancer group (24%) compared to the pilot cancer group (8%) and the RCT cancer group (16%). Total engagement was correlated with fewer prospective memory problems on instrumental activities of daily living (p = 0.018).

conclusionsMeasuring completed activities in online interventions appears a more meaningful measure of engagement than other conventional methods described in the literature and has the potential to increase treatment fidelity in web-based research.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingAdultCancer SurvivorsCognitionCognitive Behavioral TherapyFemaleHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient ParticipationPilot ProjectsCancerCognitive rehabilitationEngagementOnlineTreatment fidelityWeb-based

Identifiers

PMID28866765
OpenAlexW2753671354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.